| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2017/07/06 21:02:08
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
Basically what the title says. For things like planes, an officer of the fleet, etc, they have Aeronautica Imperialis listed on their data sheets in the faction keywords section. Is that their regiment?
|
|
|
 |
|
2017/10/30 19:53:56
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
No. It's a Faction Keyword. Same as Militarum Tempestus or Officio Prefectus. Neither of those are <Regiment> either.
What this means is that some buffs only work on them and don't work on other types of AM unit. It's just a specific keyword for Imperial Navy units.
|
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/07/06 21:56:06
 Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/06 21:56:23
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Trazyn's Museum Curator
|
I'm pretty sure that was already answered in the FAQ. You actually have to consult fluff this edition, and in fluff the Aeronautica Imperialis is not a regiment.
|
What I have
 ~4100
 ~1660
Westwood lives in death!
Peace through power!
A longbeard when it comes to Necrons and WHFB. Grumble Grumble
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/06 22:20:55
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
 CthuluIsSpy wrote:I'm pretty sure that was already answered in the FAQ. You actually have to consult fluff this edition, and in fluff the Aeronautica Imperialis is not a regiment.
Sadly they only answered about the Prefectus and the Auxilia, but made no mention of the Aeronautica Imperialis. It's probably safe to assume that precedent has been set, but I do wish they just removed all doubt and mentioned the third one. Since that's really the only other "specified regiment that may or may not be a regiment keyword"
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/06 22:24:01
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
The Aeronautica Inperialis isn't a Regiment.
|
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
|
|
|
|
|
2017/07/06 22:29:20
Subject: Re:Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
A quick Google search for Aeronautica Imperialis shows that it most definitely is not a regiment.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
|
|
|
2017/07/07 09:04:54
Subject: Is Aeronautica Imperialis a <REGIMENT> ?
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Areonautica Imperialis is the copyright-able alternative to Imperial Air Force. Which indeed, isn't a regiment, it's a branch of service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
