Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So 90% of my work is on 0.3 China cheepo, but I bought H&S Ultra on a sale which is 0.2 MM ... I used it for detail work and primed and varnished on the 0.3 China Cheapo.
Anyway I wanted to "upgrade" my H&S ultra to 0.3 with nozzle, cap and needle, but what a surprise they dont have 0.3, but 0.4... Can anyone let me know if there is any significant difference?

It'll have a higher flow rate and spray thicker paint. Easier to do basecoats, harder to do fine detail work.

I actually really like big nozzles, they're far less sensitive to thinning than the small ones. I do my priming and basecoats with a 0.7mm nozzle, go down to 0.5mm for medium detail work, and only go down to 0.3 for fine detail work. I did also have a 0.2 but I buggered the needle and never bothered to replace it because I didn't like the way it sprayed.

Spraying with a 0.7mm lets you lay paint down almost as fast as a rattle can if you want, but still gives a lot more control than a rattle can.

So 0.4 should not be any problem at all If I am used to 0.3?
Thanks!