Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Smite on one psyker in the army... That's cool, cinimatic, and not broken.

Smite on a dozen dfiferent doods? Dull and can be OP.

My favorite idea, so far, is for the matched play rule for casting the same power multiple times to be:
"Smite may be cast any number of times in one Psychic phase, but each time it is cast it causes -1 wounds for each time it has already been cast. (minimum: 1)."

Alternately, the WC goes up by 1 for each cast.

Could you imagine the nerdrage if more than one CWE unit were concealed?

I don't like the "only cast it once" rule for the "basic" powers, but a flat "Sure, just bump the WC" might not be wise, at least without other changes.

In keeping with 'Lightest Touch', I'd suggest if you use the "WC goes up by 1 for each cast", you only do that for Smite.

I meant "Don't allow repeat casts of powers other than Smite", or at least not without doing more than just having the WC go up by 1 each time.

Even if the WC of Conceal went up by 1 each time, how many units could Alaitoc get to -2 or -3 to hit in one turn? Even assuming Conceal wouldn't stack with itself, it's still scary. That nid power would be even worse.

I still think Conceal would be OP, even in that situation. But I think Smite would be fixed.

The advantage of the -1 wound per cast is that Smite Spam armies can still spam Smite (GK), but it becomes a single mortal wound each cast instead of each cast being progressively harder. It's not like GK need more nerfs.

I want Warlocks which are great at Runes of Battle, but with a passable Smite capability.

If I have one Farseer, using Smite in a pinch should do some real damage, but if I run 2 farseers and a Spirit Seer, they shouldn't each be smiting so strongly.

This is why I like the -1W each successive cast. Each GK Squad can still smite. They usually do 1 damage each, so it does the same thing. A solo psyker in the list can still smite at full strength. Two psykers, and one is still full and the other is good. 3+ psykers, and it starts dropping off.

If every psyker gets full-smite with no change, that puts a fairly high floor on the value of a psyker regardless of powers, stats, etc. But if either some psykers (Warlocks, GK Squads) get mini-Smite, you can still have Psykers that don't need to pay full price for Smite.

So our options are:
1) Make Smite less cinematic game-wide (weaker smite)
2) Put a high cost floor on any Psyker in the game (Warlocks, Primaris, and Maelifics now need to cost 50-100 pts each)
3) Implement a change that reduces Smite effectiveness as it gets recast.

The reason I like #3 is because Psyker powers are inherently once-per-turn, and Smite can only be recast by a specific rule. So it seems very light-touch to change that rule.

(Also, a -1W per Smite cast, min 1, wouldn't hurt Strike Squads much, because they usually do 1 MW already.)

Well, how good should Smite be at hitting physically-imposing models vs physically-weak models? How much of it is psychic, and how much of it is physical manifestations?

If it's "normal" wounds, what S and AP would it have? Would it autohit/autowound? How many hits?