Switch Theme:

avoiding cheese in narrative campaigns  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Lord of the Fleet






Halifornia, Nova Scotia

I feel like I always have to ask this question when people propose highlander style restrictions, but do unit variants count as duplicates? I play IG, so Russes have a bunch of variants, as do hellhounds. Does a Punisher count as a different unit than a Demolisher? Why or why not? It seems like you're okay with it as your example had two different types of terminators.

Either way, it seems totally at odds to want a fluffy campaign, then heavily restrict players to make lists that are not necessarily fluffy. If you're running a campaign for a bunch of players, I'd wager you either know them decently well already, or the group will be small enough to be managed on a case by case scenario. Rather than instituting bans that run counter to your intentions, just work with each player individually to ensure the lists aren't crazy over the top. If you want them to be their general, let them be a general and make the decisions they want, rather than forcing them through dubious fluff justifications.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: