Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

EDIT: stupid new page bug gets me again. Sorry.

I wonder what bishop was trying to achieve with his claim to be the psyker. Maybe he is a townie trying to lure a daemon to possess him and fail.

But on the other hand, I can't shake the feeling this is some other form of bluff. He could already be possessed. What better way to cast doubts all over us?

BishopGore wrote:

(...)

Amusingly, Inquisitor_Syphonius was exactly right when he said I'm a pro-town psyker. That should give everyone something to think about. I wasn't possessed by Stynier, but I do expect to be possessed next time a daemon dies, so if I start acting a little different you can all make sure a daemon dies for sure. Or I can be a safety kill the next day, just to be sure. The bluffs and double bluffs that surround that exchange should be amusing at least.

(...)

Maybe this is the sound of Stynier taunting us? But this isn't likely. How would stynier know who to possess? and if he did, why would he risk trying to hit the spook?

Oh, and about the colour thing; I think we should use the snoozy ork for people who haven't spoken in two (real) days, and the skull for those who haven't raised their voice this dayphase.

Stynier is gone man, he's long gone...

He was the daemon, he could be anywhere now.

Internet issues kept me from Dakka for a while >_>

Also Ferret quit as he probably mentioned to you all at some point, he was the second Daemon.
To the earlier question about possession, you are only able to be possessed if you have it listed in your abilities. Also the numbers I posted back in the sign up thread aren't the same as here, that would ruin the fun in a way

Current Votes
VikingScott -1
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -1
Halonachos -1
IGLannister -2
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0

With 12 alive now 7 is required to lynch, which at the moment would be Lan.
It's Wednesday leaving one week until this Day Phase ends.

Vote Log
Syph (Vote Halo)
Bishop (Vote LL)
Drk_O (Vote Lan)
Lan (Drk_O)
Lan (Unvote Drk_O)
Lan (Vote Scott)
Scott (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Unvote Lan)
Halo (No Lynch)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Bishop (Unvote LL)
Halo (Vote Bishop)
LL (Vote 50)

Thinking of making a script to count the votes for me

@Not_U: On monday I leave for a trip thats 8/9 days.

Yay! One more demon gone!

Not really. Probably someone is going to be assigned that role.

Nope it's gone.

I stand corrected.

VikingScott wrote:And BishopGore I've noticed your playstyle has differed from the other two games that i read with you in. Is that down to the amount of players or something else?

It's solar storms. My brain is running at different polarities

Lord-Loss wrote:I'm not sure about Bimshopgore, he seems to be posting more but not scum hunting.

Does three posts in a week count as a lot? Back in my day that wasn't a lot. Sad the way things go, eh.

Sorry LmL, I don't see what there is to hunt. I'm going to sit and wait while everyone else decides who to lynch and then bandwagon at the last moment. It's part of a new 'plan' I have. It's very sneaky. Like a cat. Meow.

Praise the emperor! With team loyal two guys short I was fearing we could already have lost, but this should even out the playing field.

This could very easily lead us to his mates, too. What connections can we draw from the_ferret?

Paul Atreides wrote:Praise the emperor! With team loyal two guys short I was fearing we could already have lost, but this should even out the playing field.

This could very easily lead us to his mates, too. What connections can we draw from the_ferret?

Honestly, the amount you put in to *convince* us that you're imperial is sickening.



The_Ferret left.

If you find the odd 40k platitude thrown in here and there I'll stop. Perhaps you'd care to share with me how I could possibly *convince* you of my innocence?

Alright, you might certainly not convince others.

Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.

That is simply me. I hear the cries of "how do we know you aren't just a cultist/daemon/psyker trying to kill halonachos"...

That is simply, the only way I can see you being percieved as innocent. Again, one more time, that is simply MY opportunity.

Glad to hear that. I see that your mind isn't changed by recent turn of events.

As I am sure you can remember, The_ferrett voiced suspicion of halo and IG during dayphase one, either he was trying to gain our trust by offering us two cultists in this way, or he was simply trying to get a few innocents lynched.

The more I think about it however, this is probably a point speaking for your case. If the_ferrett was trying to get a civilian killed first, he would be hard pressed to gain our trust later on. THe alternative is more logical.

Page number.

The sparse posts by the_ferret in the first few pages aren't very in depth.

Page twelve to thirteen. When pressed to point out who he would lynch if he had to, this is his response

the_ferrett, page 13 wrote:Lan due to the votes hopping. Either he and Nachoes are very indecisive or they'e playing silly buggers. Either way it raises my hackles. Heretic behaviour, maybe not. Offputting - yep!

I skimmed through the whole thread yesterday. Now I'lladmit that this is a veeeery weak lead by itself. There was one more quote from ferrett on this very subject, but I couldn't find it now. I'll try again.

This would be my bet:

Ferrett was pressed to pick someone he would lynch, you two looking like the most obvious suspects.

So, he had to pick someone... if he voted for another, he may be pushed more on it.

He may have just been trying to fade into the background...?

Disclaimer-

Don't take any insults I send your way (anyone) personally, I simply have to discredit you in any way possible as a cultist.

ahum, how does Lann and halo become you two when you refer to me?

Well, your theory sounds just as plausible as mine.

And regarding your disclaimer... Yeah, I'll keep that in mind.

Well, this is the first time I have looked at the game and not felt everyone was bitching and sniping at each other. Even if progress is slow, at least it is better than people being arses.

I don't suppose this will lift the pressure vote on me, but I genuinely have little to say about this game. I don't get the feeling Lord Loss is town, so that leaves Cult or Daemon, but I am not sure which. However, I am suspicious enough to not follow his voting patterns, but not suspicious enough to vote for him...

Other than that, I think I am leaning towards supporting Bishop Gore. I could not even tell you why, as I do not know myself. However, even if that is wrong, I have found in the past that bad votes are still better than no votes.

Paul Atreides wrote:ahum, how does Lann and halo become you two when you refer to me?

Nice catch, it's 2 AM in these parts.

I'm testing something, so I'm not going to change my vote.

So in otherwords, I'm not really adding much atm.

How long into the Day Phase ends N0t_u?

6 days.

Yeah I'll be afk then.

Fifty wrote:Other than that, I think I am leaning towards supporting Bishop Gore. I could not even tell you why, as I do not know myself. However, even if that is wrong, I have found in the past that bad votes are still better than no votes.

Supporting my ideas, or supporting a lynch on me?

I took a break yesterday and am eating out tonight so nothing from me anytime soon. Sorry.

I'd like to apologise to anyone who's been upset by things I've said over the past week. Syph sent me a nice PM asking how I thought he should play the game to make things more fun for everyone and I felt bad for some of the things I've said.

At the end of the day I haven't adapted to the different situation in this game compared to others I've played. I want the game to be the same as one I enjoyed previously, and no two games will be the same. This is my issue, not yours, and if I've made anyone uncomfortable or worried about their playstyle, I am sorry.

Bear in mind that despite my high handedness and snooty demeanour, this is only my 3rd game, I'm not an old hand or a genius, I'm still a newbie, just one with a high opinion of himself sometimes.

So, leaving all that aside, I'm going to shake myself and come back into this game with a new mind frame and try to enjoy it for what it is, a forum based game where people talk and have opinions of each other, which are usually completely wrong.

You're all awesome, and I am glad to be playing with you

Now let's lynch LL

You can't lynch me.

What evidence do you got Bim? Nothing apart from some mobojumbo about play style.

I've done nothing really suspicous, i've been a good well behavioured towny.