Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Mad Doc Grotsnik wrote:
Two different carapace Weapons seems to be the lot.

Here’s hoping we’ll see further Armiger sized.

<cue 900 resin-armed FW variants>

RoboCops vs Terminators. Noice.

Two LOW choices in a Starter set is interesting... virtually begging buyers to get a Knight next for the Superheavy Detachment, as per the WHC write-up.

 EnTyme wrote:
Why do so many people have trouble believing these are LoW models? LoW is more than just Super Heavies and GMCs.

No idea, when the first reveal even spelt it out that they're LOW... I guess it's people reading the thread not the articles and assuming internet hearsay.

Is this even worth arguing over? GW have spelt out their Battlefield Role. Seems pointless to debate it.

Indeed. It's not accident or capacity planning. GW simply chose to include a basic version so they can release the other later, so people will buy twice. Standard GW MO.