Switch Theme:

Sammael raven sword question.  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Sammaels sword says it has s x 2 on the charge, is this in addition to its normal str modifier?

011000100111010101110100001000000110100 100100000011101000110010101101100011011 000010000001111001011011110111010100100 000011101110110010100100000011101110110 010101110010011001010010000001100111011 011110110010001110011001000000110111101 101110011000110110010100100000011000010 110111001100100001000000111011101100101 001000000111001101101000011000010110110 001101100001000000110001001100101001000 000110011101101111011001000111001100100 000011000010110011101100001011010010110 1110  
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






gendoikari87 wrote:
Sammaels sword says it has s x 2 on the charge, is this in addition to its normal str modifier?
It would replace it.
Codex: Dark Angels Page 78 wrote:This weapon has Strength x2 if Sammael charged in the preceding Charge phase.
This is an outright replacement. It's similar to saying "This weapon has Strength 8 if Sammael charged in the preceding Charge phase."

If it were to keep the normal +1, it would have to say "This weapon has Strength x2 in addition to it's normal strength if Sammael charged in the preceding Charge phase."

This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2018/03/14 14:56:11


 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




It's confusing because the Raven Sword is Str +1, then the text says that it is Str x2 on the charge.

1. So does that make him (Str 4) x 2 on the charge for Str 8?

2. Or does that make him (Str x 2) + 1 on the charge for Str 9?

3. Or does that make him (Str 4 + 1) x 2 on the charge for Str 10?

I see a lot of people saying he's Str 9, but the math for that outcome is the sketchiest for me.

I'd previously thought he was Str 10 on the charge, based off of the math in option 3.

The Blood of Kittens review put him at Str 9:
Sammael has T6 and 6 wounds, a 3+ save and 4+ invulnerable. He also has WS and BS 2+, with 5 attacks, making him quite potent in combat. His Raven Sword thankfully gets a strength boost in 8th edition, being +1S (so 5 in combat), AP-3 and 2 damage with each wound. It also gives him double strength if Sammael charges, taking him up to S9 in combat. This gives him some pretty potent attacks on the turn that he charges into combat.

The Frontline Gaming review put him at Str 9 also:
He has some very potent combat ability. On the turn he charges, he gets 5 attacks at S9 that hit on a 2+ re-rollable, with -3AP. That is going to tear through most units that don’t have an invulnerable save and is even going to put a dent on vehicles and monsters. I like the flat 2 damage rather than a D3 roll. I think this makes his combat output more reliable, so you know who to send him up against, rather than hoping he rolls high for each damage roll. After he charges, he is still S5, meaning he will wound most infantry on a 3+ and other Bikers on a 5+. I think this is a great change to the Raven Sword, as one of the biggest problems with Sammael in previous editions of the games was he was limited to S4.

The Bell of Lost Souls review put him at Str 10:
Sammael and the Ravenwing Talonmaster are going to present some interesting challenges on the tabletop. If you choose the option where Sammael is riding in Sableclaw he and the Talonmaster are both land speeders that can’t be targeted by the enemy unless they are the closest model (because they are characters.) Sammael even keeps his Ravensword in this mode and keeps his 5 attacks at str 10 if he charges!

And I found a battle report video with him at Str 8.

So the player base, and the reviewers, have no sort of consensus on this.

It's a significant issue to address too, as there's a huge difference with the importance of T8 and T5 whether or not you wound on 3+ or 4+ for T8, and whether or not you wound on 2+ or 3+ for T5.

I would like to see official word from GW, or from tournament play, on this, as opposed to relying on any random person's opinions.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/03/14 15:20:10


 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Those reviewers are simply wrong. It's almost like most "journalists" have no idea what they are talking about. < This emoticon indicates that the previous sentence is in jest, playful teasing, and not an attack on the journalists themselves.

The S10 idea is doublepluswrong since the rules explicitly tell you do multiplication before any addition.
BRB 175 wrote:You may also encounter abilities and rules that modify a characteristic. All modifiers are cumulative, though you should apply any multiplication or division to the characteristic (rounding fractions up) before applying any addition or subtraction
An FAQ to clear it up would be nice, whether it's clarification or Special Snowflake.

This message was edited 6 times. Last update was at 2018/03/14 15:31:52


 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




. All modifiers are cumulative, though you should apply any multiplication or division to the characteristic (rounding fractions up) before applying any addition or subtraction


That kinda supports the Str 9 position, and explains how people were getting to it. (Str x2) for "apply multiplication", then +1 for the sword for "applying any addition", and you use both because "All modifiers are cumulative".

A FAQ would be nice.
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Progurt wrote:
. All modifiers are cumulative, though you should apply any multiplication or division to the characteristic (rounding fractions up) before applying any addition or subtraction


That kinda supports the Str 9 position, and explains how people were getting to it. (Str x2) for "apply multiplication", then +1 for the sword for "applying any addition", and you use both because "All modifiers are cumulative".

A FAQ would be nice.
Except this isn't a case of cumulative modifiers. The rule is totally replacing the strength value of the weapon. A weapons strength is not some passive buff that always applies and changes the base profile, it only works when you use the weapon. In this case the S value has been replaced with "x2".

If Sammal was in some sort of +1S aura (but not the Blood Angels one because SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE FAQ ftw), then yeah he'd be S9, but that isn't what is happening here.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2018/03/14 15:47:00


 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Agree with BCB that it's either/or, not a double buff.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




I talked to SaltyJohn, one of the LVO judges and he said

"Looking at the wording of the sword he would be str 8 on the charge as the Str profile of the weapon (+1) is replaced with x2. In subsequent, non-charging, rounds of combat the sword profile returns to +1. I confirmed with 2 other LVO judges."
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: