BBAP wrote:Robert Gullible, that's him. All the fluff I'm reading says he's "incensed" by the Emperor-worship, finds it "despicable", all that jazz. Pretty strong stuff, although I suppose there's no direct threat to do anything about it. Just seems like they're talking it up an awful lot.
Here's the simple formula for deciding what fluff, new or old, is important or otherwise in 8th Ed: will it immediately negatively impact, in any way, model sales based on the status quo ante? If No, it's fine to take it at face value. If Yes, acknowledge or ignore it to whatever degree you like because
GW will do exactly that.
Big rifty teary thing dividing the Imperium in two, no really, it's totes serious business; except if
GW need a character or faction to cross it to make sure everyone everywhere has Primaris and all the corners they wrote themselves into when
40K was still a "minutes to midnight" setting can be Deus Ex Machina'd out of again, in which case fleets will nip across like they're popping out for a pint of milk. Prior attitudes of Space Marine chapters, parts of their character and mode of thought that have seemed set in stone for their whole existence; cast-iron, until they have a wee cup of tea and a chat with Rowboat and a Custodian, at which point they'll happily embrace the new-but-not-actually-that-different status quo. Characters with firmly stated traits and motivations; will have an appreciable effect directly related to how much they would impact said status quo.
So, no matter how much Rowboat dislikes the Ecclesiarchy, no matter how suspicious some Chapters would be of Primaris and of Rowboat himself, no matter how much you read about some Inquisitors forming cabals to plot against Rowboat, no matter how dire a cliffhanger is for a plot in "the bad half", when it comes right down to it actually following through on such things would limit the appeal of some models to some customers and so they'll go nowhere. The "plot" of 8th is constructed entirely to give the impression of forward narrative momentum without actually changing anything of note, the needle will swing one way or another but it'll never redline - no chapter will end up refusing Primaris, no Inquisitors will ever actually move against Rowboat, and Rowboat will never actually do anything about the Ecclesiarchy except grumble to himself in third-person narrative thought-bubbles or commiserate with his Custodian bodyguards about how unwashed the masses are these days.
Reading back, that all comes off a lot more bitter than I intended when typing it, but I'm just trying to emphasise that more than ever before the only version of
40K that really matters is the one in your own head, because if
GW are moving forward with the attitude that the background, old or new, only matters to them so long as it's convenient, why should it matter to fans what
GW think is "official" at all? What's "official" today could mean nothing tomorrow, so the best way
IMO is "do what thou wilt" - if you think there's some cool conflict to be mined from
GW's characterisation of the Xenos Abomination - sorry, "gloriously returned Primarch"

- then grab a pickaxe and have at it, otherwise any question along the lines of "is XYZ significant/likely to lead to anything" will be answered "probably not".