Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Pretty good! Really neat disaster/Apocalypse kind of movie with a road trip into the disaster zone and a vague unknown cause of the trouble. You follow ground level view with all the ignorance that accompanies it. Wild storms and weird effects. I definitely recommend.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Woops! wrong forum. Could this be moved to Geek Media?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/07/22 21:03:24
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
Pretty good! Really neat disaster/Apocalypse kind of movie with a road trip into the disaster zone and a vague unknown cause of the trouble. You follow ground level view with all the ignorance that accompanies it. Wild storms and weird effects. I definitely recommend.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Woops! wrong forum. Could this be moved to Geek Media?
Hmm, well, I think the RAI here is pretty obvious: GW wants their games to end and for them to be cinematic.
The problem is the RAW doesn't really allow this. The RAW is cumbersome, devoted to minutiae and requires us to do hilarious abstractions like supermen infantry flying diagonally through Ruins. We also have the unintended problem of slow play which is keeping games from ending 'naturally', as it were.
All in all, I'd say check with a TO. Also, Bacon can add this to his sig of issues.
Pretty good! Really neat disaster/Apocalypse kind of movie with a road trip into the disaster zone and a vague unknown cause of the trouble. You follow ground level view with all the ignorance that accompanies it. Wild storms and weird effects. I definitely recommend.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Woops! wrong forum. Could this be moved to Geek Media?
Hmm, well, I think the RAI here is pretty obvious: GW wants their games to end and for them to be cinematic.
The problem is the RAW doesn't really allow this. The RAW is cumbersome, devoted to minutiae and requires us to do hilarious abstractions like supermen infantry flying diagonally through Ruins. We also have the unintended problem of slow play which is keeping games from ending 'naturally', as it were.
All in all, I'd say check with a TO. Also, Bacon can add this to his sig of issues.
Do you have a page number or Special Snowflake FAQ to back that up?
Pretty good! Really neat disaster/Apocalypse kind of movie with a road trip into the disaster zone and a vague unknown cause of the trouble. You follow ground level view with all the ignorance that accompanies it. Wild storms and weird effects. I definitely recommend.
Automatically Appended Next Post: Woops! wrong forum. Could this be moved to Geek Media?
Hmm, well, I think the RAI here is pretty obvious: GW wants their games to end and for them to be cinematic.
The problem is the RAW doesn't really allow this. The RAW is cumbersome, devoted to minutiae and requires us to do hilarious abstractions like supermen infantry flying diagonally through Ruins. We also have the unintended problem of slow play which is keeping games from ending 'naturally', as it were.
All in all, I'd say check with a TO. Also, Bacon can add this to his sig of issues.
Do you have a page number or Special Snowflake FAQ to back that up?
So I reported myself and asked for this to be moved. I kind of love that it hasn't been yet. This rules commentary is pretty great. Keep up the good work guys!
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
I have to say, I tried this movie based on seeing this thread, and I think the script was painful . I mean, when you've got an actor like Forest Whitaker sounding wooden, you know you've done something wrong . I couldn't make it through it... there was definitely potential, but I skipped ahead to near the end after getting about halfway...
I thought his fiancee was a great actress, it would've been nice to see her have more of a role in the movie. The main character's acting was lacking to me, though (but again, could be the script!).
4/10 for me, would only watch if really scraping the bottom of the SciFi / post-apoc barrel!
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2018/07/30 02:59:22
. I mean, when you've got an actor like Forest Whitaker sounding wooden, you know you've done something wrong 
. I couldn't make it through it... there was definitely potential, but I skipped ahead to near the end after getting about halfway...