Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Davor wrote:
I don't correct everyone on the net, just the people who complain about it and then do the exact thing.

Which is an odd thing to do in this particular case, really. It's perfectly justified to complain about a professional not doing something right, even if you can't or won't do that thing right yourself. That is, after all, why we pay professionals to do those things.


Having said that, I do find it a little hard to believe that anyone who has been around this hobby for longer than 5 minutes would only just now be noticing that GW don't put a lot of effort into proof-reading. My personal favourite proof-reading highlight was an editorial in the Oz edition of White Dwarf some years back (when they had their own editorial team) apologising for the errors in the previous issue, that had typos in it.


And having said that, in the grand scheme of things a list missing a few bullets is hardly the stuff of nightmares.