[Kill Team] Necron Kill Team Tactica

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Tiberius501**

Hey, could I ask why Warriors are considered to be bad? 12pts I guess is a lot, but they do have RP which seems pretty tanky if behind cover and -1AP which is quite nice for a small scale game.

**Tiberius501**

Daetya wrote:
Doesn't take in account that you win games by taking objectives, and more cheaper models are more effective at doing that than few elite ones

Yeah this is what I was thinking. You make a lot of obviously good points but, warriors seem good to get an extra model in there for objective capping. And with RP, they seem pretty resilient to do it

**Tiberius501**

hvg3akaek wrote:
For 100 points, you could have 6 immortals, or 8 warriors. Or, 5 immortals and 2 flayed ones (7 bodies total).

Stick them in cover, and you have 3+ saves and injury rolls that only kill on a 5. I haven't minded the "lower" model count so far - against eldar or dark eldar, tyranid swarms, or Ad Mech. Often, I still have more models (vs tyranid monsters, space marines, or thousand sons).

This is also true. I just want an excuse to use my swathe of warrior models. Tell me they don't suck!