Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 zend wrote:
The fluff for this set is lazy and doesn't make sense. Eldar care about the fate of the universe enough to save the Imperium's ass and resurrect a Primarch for them, but here they are fighting the Imperium again on a world that's touted as being a fragile thread that's holding the Imperium together. The Ultramarines should also be way more tolerant of the Eldar

Having the Ultras vs Saim Hann does seem less about what fits the fluff and more about what armies the studio already has painted up The Kill team background mentions the Iron Hands being present on Vigilus. They would IMO be a much better fit for this story.

That said, it was the Ynnari who helped to bring Roboute back not the Craftworlders. The majority of the Eldar factions see them at best as misguided, at worst as dangerous fanatics. Likewise Guilliman(and by extension the Ultras) is not daft enough to assume that all the different Eldar groups are on board with his secret alliance of convenience with Yvraine and her flock.

https://www.warhammer-community.com/2018/09/30/24th-sept-grim-dark-corners-the-aeldari-pantheongw-homepage-post-2-gw-homepage-post-3/

Nice fluff summary of the Eldar gods on WHC. It could be nothing as the Eldar are not exactly spoilt for choice these days when it comes to live deity's, but GW do keep mentioning Isha in there background