Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/17 01:42:56
Subject: Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
Sacratomato
|
In a fun game of Meat Grinder mixed in with Planetfall along with Fire and Fury - 6 players and 2000 points:
Which do you like better,
Dakka Stormraven
or
One of each Imperial Assassin, (the Culexus will be escorting Robby G)
|
70% of all statistics are made up on the spot by 64% of the people that produce false statistics 54% of the time that they produce them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/17 09:57:25
Subject: Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
If it's supposed to be fun, for your opponent's sake probably not assassins and Guilliman...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/17 16:33:08
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 09:08:50
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Focused Fire Warrior
|
HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 09:19:12
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Ozomoto wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
Sure, just not to play against
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 15:01:54
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Speedy Swiftclaw Biker
|
Stux wrote:Ozomoto wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
Sure, just not to play against 
I don't understand this mentality. What is more fun than having the chance to killy Bobby G? The more epic the models on the table, the higher the stakes and more fun the game gets imo.
Also, if you are having a hard time against marines of any kind, including those with a primarch, you really need to think about your tactics instead of blaming someone's " OP model".
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 15:08:52
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
beir wrote: Stux wrote:Ozomoto wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
Sure, just not to play against 
I don't understand this mentality. What is more fun than having the chance to killy Bobby G? The more epic the models on the table, the higher the stakes and more fun the game gets imo.
Also, if you are having a hard time against marines of any kind, including those with a primarch, you really need to think about your tactics instead of blaming someone's " OP model".
I never said it was OP. I said it wasn't fun. They are not the same thing.
Playing against a Guilliman castle is no fun, screening it with Culexus assassins makes it all the less fun to deal with.
It's not that it's impossible to win against, it's that G is generally used as an unkillable buff stick. That's not epic.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 15:24:01
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
beir wrote:
Also, if you are having a hard time against marines of any kind, including those with a primarch, you really need to think about your tactics instead of blaming someone's " OP model".
There is a few armies which to kill Gulliman need the controling player to let them kill him. no amount of tactics helps, if your only option to kill him is to somehow get him in the open and charge with your entire army and hope he fails his res roll.
|
If you have to kill, then kill in the best manner. If you slaughter, then slaughter in the best manner. Let one of you sharpen his knife so his animal feels no pain. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 18:59:16
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Stux wrote: beir wrote: Stux wrote:Ozomoto wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
Sure, just not to play against 
I don't understand this mentality. What is more fun than having the chance to killy Bobby G? The more epic the models on the table, the higher the stakes and more fun the game gets imo.
Also, if you are having a hard time against marines of any kind, including those with a primarch, you really need to think about your tactics instead of blaming someone's " OP model".
I never said it was OP. I said it wasn't fun. They are not the same thing.
Playing against a Guilliman castle is no fun, screening it with Culexus assassins makes it all the less fun to deal with.
It's not that it's impossible to win against, it's that G is generally used as an unkillable buff stick. That's not epic.
To you, maybe. I want to face GOOD armies, and if that's the way the vanilla codex can function so be it.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2018/11/18 19:13:54
Subject: Re:Dakka Stormraven or 4 Imperial Assassins?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
|
Slayer-Fan123 wrote: Stux wrote: beir wrote: Stux wrote:Ozomoto wrote:HoundsofDemos wrote:I'd say the assassins but only if you leave Bobby G at home. Primarch doesn't exactly scream fun and casual game.
Why? they are tons of fun to play with
Sure, just not to play against 
I don't understand this mentality. What is more fun than having the chance to killy Bobby G? The more epic the models on the table, the higher the stakes and more fun the game gets imo.
Also, if you are having a hard time against marines of any kind, including those with a primarch, you really need to think about your tactics instead of blaming someone's " OP model".
I never said it was OP. I said it wasn't fun. They are not the same thing.
Playing against a Guilliman castle is no fun, screening it with Culexus assassins makes it all the less fun to deal with.
It's not that it's impossible to win against, it's that G is generally used as an unkillable buff stick. That's not epic.
To you, maybe. I want to face GOOD armies, and if that's the way the vanilla codex can function so be it.
The original question is what would be more fun. I'm simply answering that.
If the question was which would be more competitive then I would likely answer differently.
If to you fun and competitive are analogous though then fair enough.
|
|
 |
 |
|