Waelfwulf wrote:Scenario: Oathkeeper Black Templar warlord with a 6" heroic intervention range charges an infantry squad and fights one round of combat. The infantry squad then retreats 5" away. The Black Templar warlord does a heroic intervention on the infantry squad, during the opposing players charge phase, locking the infantry squad back up in combat. Here's the question, because the infantry squad didn't charge, do they get to fight? If so, who fights first? Is it the infantry squad, because it is that players turn? Or is it the Black Templar Warlord due to heroic intervention?
I believe that that the infantry squad is allowed to attack, and will in fact attack first, because I cannot find anything in any errata to suggest otherwise. Help me out to clear this up, thanks!
It depends on the situation. Any units that charged fight first. Then the player whose turn it is chooses a unit to fight with first. If there is another unit already in
CC, and he chooses that unit, you can choose your
BT warlord to fight next, because players alternate choosing eligible units to fight with. If the unit you
HI into with your
BT warlord is the only unit in
CC, then yes, they fight first.
Eihnlazer wrote:How are you heroic interventioning an unengaged unit?
You can always
HI, even if your opponent didnt declare any charges.
BRB update 1.3 :
Q: Can you perform Heroic Interventions in your opponent’s
charge phase even if they did not declare any charges
that phase?
A: Yes.
Q: Can you ever perform a Heroic Intervention during your
own turn?
A: No.