Pancakey wrote:Spectral Ceramite wrote:IDK, our gaming group loves Necromunda... So I am biased (I am also
GM for our Necro games so...), the rules release ye was a pain in the ass but they got them sorted (to an extent). The models are ok but it was good enough.
Personally, I think necro was a trial for other specialist games or a game in the future, wait out for that... Was a good trial, showed what the community hated and loved. Same with
AT.
While you might be on to something, the questions that
GW “asked” were moronic.
“Do you think we should put all the rules in one book?”
“Naaah break it up into 6-7 books, fracture all the rules, piss everyone off and THEN release a compendium of rules so they have to buy the rules again! That’s what people want!”
See warhammer 8th edition for more of these garabage “trials”.

Honestly it didnt piss me off (prob 1 of few), I understood it took time to develop rules but they wanted us to play test, I knew I was buying into a trial system. perspective I suppose
I preferred regular updates I knew where coming than random changes
Think this worked out better than 8th or a system where if had of released since start we would of had 3 updates or more etc etc. I think this worked out better, just people only see initial out lay not overall