Switch Theme:

Wargaming subscription service?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols






Has anyone ever mentioned this idea before? A games company (like, say, Gamesworkshop) providing all of their rules via a monthly subscription service that’s automatically updated when changed with alerts etc. Maybe with separate services for each game? Is that economically viable? Although you wouldn’t make as much on book sales, you would have every person interested in your stuff paying in.
   
Made in gb
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan





Bristol, England

I'd be super happy to pay £100-150 per year to ensure that I had a hard copy of all of GW'S rules and codexs each year.
In reality its probably double that, citation needed if someone wants to do the maths that'd be great, but that's how it feels. That's too much imo. Give me the option of paying extra for hardback and minor fluff changes but don't try to make me buy it all to stay current ruleswise, I won't and don't.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/02/20 21:56:01


Oli: Can I be an orc?
Everyone: No.
Oli: But it fits through the doors, Look! 
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob





Dorset, England

It's not a bad idea, but don't most people play one or two armies? The number of people who need every codex and rules update must be quite small...
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Even if it's a "good" idea, it will come across as a money grab, GW will implement it in a terrible way anyway, and GW has no incentive to do so since us idiots still buy unusable Digital Versions and/or instantly out of date Dead Tree Carcass versions so why would they stop selling codexes as they are now?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/02/20 22:34:03


 
   
Made in gb
Master Engineer with a Brace of Pistols






 Kroem wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but don't most people play one or two armies? The number of people who need every codex and rules update must be quite small...


That is true, but...it would mean that you’re extracting a little bit of money from everyone every month rather than a fair bit from some. Now whether that’s right or not...I don’t know.

It would have the advantage of allowing anyone to check anything out instantly. Plus, it could really help out with balance if points and rules could be adjusted on a monthly basis.

It feels like the future imo.
   
Made in ca
Junior Officer with Laspistol





London, Ontario

Privateer Press has free rules available online, a paperback copy of the rules in each $45 (CAD) starter box, free, printable “cards” for each unit online, and their War Room 2 app costs $12 CAD per faction or $120 for every faction in the game, for the duration of an edition.

The rules are ultra-affordable. both the free online cards and the app are updated regularly. I hear the models are expensive and hard to come by in Europe, but in NA they’re much more affordable than 40k... in part because the old communities are dying and people are selling stuff off cheap... but even at list price it’s cheaper to build 2 Themes @ 75 points each rather than 1500 points of 40k. In North America.
   
Made in gb
Walking Dead Wraithlord






Yeah take my money. Give me a ruuning up to date ruleset and information. I'm one of the suckers who'd happily pay £60 a year for the convenience of having a one book reference type deal.

https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/772746.page#10378083 - My progress/failblog painting blog thingy

Eldar- 4436 pts


AngryAngel80 wrote:
I don't know, when I see awesome rules, I'm like " Baby, your rules looking so fine. Maybe I gotta add you to my first strike battalion eh ? "


 Eonfuzz wrote:


I would much rather everyone have a half ass than no ass.


"A warrior does not seek fame and honour. They come to him as he humbly follows his path"  
   
Made in us
Clousseau




 Kroem wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but don't most people play one or two armies? The number of people who need every codex and rules update must be quite small...


Competitive players absolutely need every army rule because otherwise someone will play their army wrong against them, they won't know any better, and that could lead them to lose the game due to a misplayed rule. In an event like a tournament, that is unacceptable, and so competitive players have always collected every rulebook to stay on top of every rule so that being misplayed cannot happen.
   
Made in gb
Moustache-twirling Princeps





Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry

 Future War Cultist wrote:
It feels like the future imo.
Wizards of the Coast tried it with D&D.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/
Bah, it's more like Army Builder or such, but you have to buy the books to use on it.
Buy just the class or item, or monster, if you don't want the whole book it comes in.
The subscription allows for sharing content and more slots.

6000 pts - Harlies: 1000 pts - 4000 pts - 1000 pts - 1000 pts DS:70+S+G++MB+IPw40k86/f+D++A++/cWD64R+T(T)DM+
IG/AM force nearly-finished pieces: http://www.dakkadakka.com/gallery/images-38888-41159_Armies%20-%20Imperial%20Guard.html
"We don't stop playing because we grow old; we grow old because we stop playing." - George Bernard Shaw (probably)
Clubs around Coventry, UK https://discord.gg/6Gk7Xyh5Bf 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




auticus wrote:
 Kroem wrote:
It's not a bad idea, but don't most people play one or two armies? The number of people who need every codex and rules update must be quite small...


Competitive players absolutely need every army rule because otherwise someone will play their army wrong against them, they won't know any better, and that could lead them to lose the game due to a misplayed rule. In an event like a tournament, that is unacceptable, and so competitive players have always collected every rulebook to stay on top of every rule so that being misplayed cannot happen.


The competitive community isn't nearly big enough to sustain a service like this on its own. Also, I don't think they need access to every rulebook, just a good idea of how the rules work for each faction which often comes through practice. I think it's going to be extremely rare for aplayer to own every Codex and supplement out there, even among competitive players. When I played competitive WH I didn't own every book and supplement and it worked just fine at tournaments.

If we're talking about radical steps GW could take with their rules I think a much better approach would be to follow the general trend in the industry and make the rules free and freely available.
   
Made in gb
Nasty Nob





Dorset, England

There are probably some serious collectors who buy all the codex's as well, but they might still be inclined to buy the hard copies rather than a subscription.

You know, the sort of guy that has a 'side project' of 4000 points of Dark Eldar to go with his 15,000 points of Chaos!
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: