Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 09:04:08
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
When I first read the Inevitable Fate stratagem, I thought it was just the Unbind Souls spell as a Stratagem.
However, when I looked more closely, I noticed this:
Use this stratagem at the start of the fight phase. Re-roll wound rolls for attacks made with melee weapons by Ynnari units that target that unit until the end of the fight phase.
(Emphasis mine.)
Notice that rerolling wounds isn't optional. Nor is there any provision for only rerolling failed wounds.
So unless I'm mistaken, if you use this Stratagem then you roll all your wound rolls, then pick up all those dice - regardless of whether or not they wounded - and roll them all again. Thus making the initial roll entirely pointless.
Unless you're clairvoyant and know that your first wound roll is going to be nothing but 1s, I fail to see the point of this Stratagem.
Am I missing something here?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 09:20:10
Subject: Re:Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
RAW, you must re-roll all wound rolls for that unit.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 09:21:24
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain
|
An over-literal reading would show that, yes. Clearly it’s intended to be beneficial not to force you to reroll successes, but cue RAWAACmongering...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/30 09:21:47
Stormonu wrote:For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 09:57:05
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The thing you're missing is that GW does not tend to write completely useless rules. RAW, you could well argue that you have to re-roll all wound rolls, thereby making the stratagem not just useless but potentially actively disadvantageous.
If you want to play by strict RAW the stratagem just prolongs your game by making you roll more dice for very little reason but I think 99%+ of players will interpret it to allow you to re-roll failed wound rolls. Contact GW's rules team and maybe they'll put it in the Ynarri FAQ.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 12:57:07
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Androgynous Daemon Prince of Slaanesh
|
I’d say adding “you may” and “any” fixes it entirely; pick the ones you want to reroll. Works like Abaddon that way. Roll twice for no reason and spending CP to do it is beyond asinine, and anybody forcing that on you is somebody you don’t want to play with, let alone associate with.
|
Reality is a nice place to visit, but I'd hate to live there.
Manchu wrote:I'm a Catholic. We eat our God.
Due to work, I can usually only ship any sales or trades out on Saturday morning. Please trade/purchase with this in mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 13:09:36
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
Russia, Moscow
|
When you put out Ynnari FAQ and make Fire and Fade 1CP, but your proofreaders still keep delivering.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/05/30 13:09:46
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 13:09:55
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
Slipspace wrote:The thing you're missing is that GW does not tend to write completely useless rules.
I think you'll find that this is indeed the case.
To the OP, you are correct you must re-roll all wound rolls.
Good thing GW just released a Ynarri Index Errata that fixes.. oh.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 13:11:56
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I think this falls under the same category as the Squiggoths rules in Index Xenos 2, where it states that you roll a dice and "on a 2, the unit takes D3 mortal wounds" - clearly it is intended to be 2+, but RAW, it's exclusively on a roll of a 2!
Anyone who forces you to use this as rerolling the entire roll, whilst they may be RAW correct, isn't worth playing.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/05/30 14:14:12
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Killer Klaivex
The dark behind the eyes.
|
Slipspace wrote:The thing you're missing is that GW does not tend to write completely useless rules.
Er... that's debatable. Many would say that A Taste For Death (another Ynnari stratagem) is indeed useless. And not even due to issues of RAW. It just serves no purpose whatsoever.
BaconCatBug wrote:Slipspace wrote:The thing you're missing is that GW does not tend to write completely useless rules.
I think you'll find that this is indeed the case.
To the OP, you are correct you must re-roll all wound rolls.
Good thing GW just released a Ynarri Index Errata that fixes.. oh.
Will you be adding this to your collection?
|
blood reaper wrote:I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.
the_scotsman wrote:Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"
Argive wrote:GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.
Andilus Greatsword wrote:
"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"
Akiasura wrote:I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.
insaniak wrote:
You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.
Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2019/06/05 21:42:46
Subject: Is Inevitable Fate Pointless?
|
 |
Powerful Ushbati
|
vipoid wrote:When I first read the Inevitable Fate stratagem, I thought it was just the Unbind Souls spell as a Stratagem.
However, when I looked more closely, I noticed this:
Use this stratagem at the start of the fight phase. Re-roll wound rolls for attacks made with melee weapons by Ynnari units that target that unit until the end of the fight phase.
(Emphasis mine.)
Notice that rerolling wounds isn't optional. Nor is there any provision for only rerolling failed wounds.
So unless I'm mistaken, if you use this Stratagem then you roll all your wound rolls, then pick up all those dice - regardless of whether or not they wounded - and roll them all again. Thus making the initial roll entirely pointless.
Unless you're clairvoyant and know that your first wound roll is going to be nothing but 1s, I fail to see the point of this Stratagem.
Am I missing something here?
Pretty clear the intent of this stratagem is. I'd say anyone who tuffs you on it, tell them to sit and spin.
|
|
 |
 |
|