Switch Theme:

Covering Fire?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





I was looking at Secutarii Peltasts and it occurred to me that maybe covering fire could work if it only hit on a 6, and caused the targeted unit a -1 to hit.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut







What’s the purpose of covering fire?

It seems like it’s either end up as a bonus debuff as you shoot stuff at a unit you need to kill, or “This unit doesn’t have anything else useful to do, so it’ll shoot at that unit just to annoy it”. And then it’s just one more advantage for winning the roll to shoot first.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut



London

There is an IG stratagem for supressive fire - you hit nothing but target can't overwatch and moves at half speed.
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut





@The_Real_Chris:

That's pretty cool. More options for removing overwatch or changing another unit's behaviour are always good.
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User





 solkan wrote:
What’s the purpose of covering fire?

It seems like it’s either end up as a bonus debuff as you shoot stuff at a unit you need to kill, or “This unit doesn’t have anything else useful to do, so it’ll shoot at that unit just to annoy it”. And then it’s just one more advantage for winning the roll to shoot first.


I always forget that most people don't play with AA like I do because I had a completely different immediate reaction. I do agree that something like this shouldn't exist with the IGOUGO turns because it is absolutely a win more mechanic at that point. With alternate activation tho I could see this being cool.
   
Made in us
Happy Imperial Citizen





Covering fire would be cool, but I feel like the purpose of 8th edition it to be less complicated. Maybe if they added it to heresy era rules...

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: