Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

How about turning the fantasy timeline back before the domestication of the horse?

Thus, I am curious how Oathmark plays without cavalry as I would like my fantasy to be about infantry, spellcasters, and monsters.

Any such insight about or experience from Oathmark games without cavalry?

 auticus wrote:

There is nothing written that says historical wargames are the only place for this type of thing. And we have fantasy versions that use command and control. Warmaster. And now Oathmark uses it as well.

Could you please explain to me what is the "command and control" part of Oathmark. Thus, with "command and control" being a compound term, what is the "command" and what is the "control" in Oathmark?