Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
The US army has a naming survey for a new vehicle, one of the options is Manticore, described as "Fictional missile launching tank in the game Warhammer"
Many good choices. But the Manticore has my vote. I used to have a Necromancer riding one for me old Undead army, and voting for a 40k name is all S's & G's for me, as is voting on the name of American hardware....
I love that the Warhammer model falls under the category of "military or civilian system." My problem with Manticore though is that isn't that a surface to surface weapon, whereas the SHORAD is surface to air? Wouldn't a Hydra be more appropriate?
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/07/23 07:36:42
