Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So I found an interesting oversight in battle scribe or maybe not. I don't think this is but is the Operative Requisition Sanctioned stratagem still valid in 9th? If it is it would allow an Inquisitor and a assassin in a single detachment. At -2 cp a patrol would work just as well but would have hq and troop tax. Just looked it seems Index: Officio Assassinorum still has a FAQ.

TheBoy wrote:
So I found an interesting oversight in battle scribe or maybe not. I don't think this is but is the Operative Requisition Sanctioned stratagem still valid in 9th? If it is it would allow an Inquisitor and a assassin in a single detachment. At -2 cp a patrol would work just as well but would have hq and troop tax. Just looked it seems Index: Officio Assassinorum still has a FAQ.

No, it's not. The Assassin rules, in full, have been superseded by the ones found in War of the Spider. You always use the latest rules.

For those so inclined regarding "precedent", the SM FAQ makes this explicit.