Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Insectum7 wrote:

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:

Which is the go-to argument with people in casual as all hell metas that refuse to admit there are problems with the game or simply won't acknowledge them, hence why it is to be ignored.

Oh I admit there are problems with the game. But I also think that catchy gimmick rules are no substitution for good play.

You're in opposition to GW on that one lol

 Insectum7 wrote:
^Yeah, Carnifexes etc. being kinda lacklustre in CC is pretty brutal.

I also preferred this relationship to Warriors:

Spoiler:

Remember, Carnifex used to have the same to-hit as marines, but it was nerfed to sell newer models.

Nid players are still suffering from that.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 Insectum7 wrote:

Hecaton wrote:

 Insectum7 wrote:

Slayer-Fan123 wrote:

Which is the go-to argument with people in casual as all hell metas that refuse to admit there are problems with the game or simply won't acknowledge them, hence why it is to be ignored.

Oh I admit there are problems with the game. But I also think that catchy gimmick rules are no substitution for good play.

You're in opposition to GW on that one lol

Well, they're still not a substitution for good play. But the design focus on strats, etc. is pretty obnoxious.

I mean that GW doesn't want a game with a skill curve that rewards smart play. They want a game that rewards purchases.