Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I've posted this on the 40k proposed rules section but was unsure if that was the right place so thought I'd post here too.

Sorry if that is bad etiquette, please remove whichever one isn't appropriate.



This may sound a bit strange, seeing as Epic exists but...

I don't want to play epic (don't want to learn another rules at the minute for a game I'm going to play solo) and I like the bare bones of 40k (hit/wound/save) but I don't like strategems and cards etc. I don't want to play magic the gathering I want to put my minis on the table and not have to faff with extra bits.


I plan on doing infantry heavy marine Vs marine or marine Vs Ork battles (because that's what I have)

I'm going to:
-Use existing unit stats
-Use Multibased minis
-Use cities of death terrain rules
-Get rid of all cards etc
-Keep IGOUGO
-Use DENSE terrain
-figure out a flanking mechanic that punishes poor positioning or being outmanoeuvred.
-Devise a moral system or incorporate the current morale system.

The main thing that will be a massive change = casualties/damage.

-Instead of unit removal I will abstract it without actually changing much. A unit of Space Marines will still have the same ammount of wounds but will function as a whole unit until they reach 50% wounds. At which point they need to test moral - do they rout or stay out? If they don't rout they will only have half shots at this point signifying dead/wounded and pinned troops.

I think this could be pretty fun, is cheap and encourages manoeuvre and careful placement of units.

The wound (damage system) doesn't really change mechanics wise but is abstracted to simulate morale and pinning etc.

It's like my little homebrew smaller scale epic - in between 40k and epic/apocalypse.

Any suggestions to make this better? I was considering making it alternate activation but with the cover rules, starting further away and units maintaining an ability to kill stuff and stay on the board for longer, alpha strike doesn't seem like such a problem. Especially as I plan to create scenarios rather than scrabbling for objectives

So you're scaling down 40k, keeping the same rules, presumably dropping to metric (1cm = 1") to keep all the ranges aligned with model size?

What do you mean by "get rid of all cards etc."? getting rid of stratagems will unbalance the game (more) as some units are priced to use stratagems. If you're going down that route, I recommend going back to the 7th edition rules as a basis.

I would be looking to directly abstract the squad system by having bases of infantry. One base (being a small square base because then you can use firing arcs) represents up to 5 models. Bases have numbers of wounds and reduce effectiveness as the wounds drop, representing models dying. Bases get removed to keep squad footprints consistent.

So a base of 5 primaris marines would have 10 wounds and loses 2 attacks and 2 shots for each 2 wounds lost, providing a direct equivalent to 40k.

50% isn't a great way to go with this - here's the comparison:

30 ork boys lose 16 models, leaves 14, who fail their morale and disappear.

Meanwhile a unit of 10 loses 4, leaving 6, who don't have to test.

I would have 6 models more likely to run than 15!

Now, one way to do this is to adjust the number of models per base, and then have morale kick in when there is 1 base left.

EG 3 marines per base and 5 orks per base. a unit of 12 marines is 4 bases, a unit of 10 orks is 2 bases. When the unit drops to 1 base, they start taking morale. So orks start running sooner than marines (as we expect they would). Marines also have the option for smaller units.

I think this isn't a bad starting point. A couple ideas for you WRT how to incorporate some more maneuver based elements:

Let's assume that every unit is based on a rectangular base of some sort. Units may declare shooting attacks and Fight phase attacks in an arc that extends 45 degrees out from the corner of their rectangular base.

As a part of any move, a non-flyer unit may pivot freely to face in any direction. Any attack (ranged or melee) that can draw a straight line in firing arc to the rear line of the target unit's base receives +1 to the wound roll. When a unit is charged, the pile-in move may include a free pivot to face directly towards the charging unit.

So, how do you take advantage of this if you can freely pivot during your normal movement?

-Units that are already within Engagement Range when they are charged may not Pivot

-Units that perform a Fall Back move must end their move facing directly away from units they started the turn in Engagement Range of

-Units that are Broken (more on that later) may not move, and consequently may not pivot

-Units that perform a charge move must face directly toward a unit that was a target of that charge

-Units on Overwatch (more on that later) may not move or pivot.

OK, on to Overwatch!

You're getting rid of strats, that means getting rid of Overwatch as a stratagem, so we can freely add it back in as a way to make the IGOUGO structure more interesting.

Rather than acting normally in its turn, a unit not within Engagement Range may choose to go on Overwatch. When Overwatch is declared in the movement phase, the unit may only pivot rather than moving, and may not act in the shooting, charge or fight phases later in the turn.

You may declare a unit on Overwatch will attack at any point after an opponent either completes a move during their movement phase, or declares a shooting attack or a charge during their shooting or charge phase. The unit immediately shoots as if it were your shooting phase, with a -1 penalty to all hit rolls made.

Units with abilities that would ordinarily cause them to be able to fire Overwatch shots on a number other than 6 instead fire overwatch shots without a -1 to hit penalty (E.g. the T'au subfaction trait)

And lastly morale.

The last phase of the turn is the Morale Phase. A unit must make a Leadership Test in the Morale Phase if one of three conditions have occurred:

-The unit has only a single model and that model has taken over 1/2 of its total Wounds

-The unit has taken one or more casualties that turn

-The unit is already Broken

To take a Leadership Test roll 2d6. If the result exceeds the highest Leadership value in the unit, the unit is Broken. A Broken unit may not end its move closer to the closest enemy unit, must declare a Fall Back move if it begins its turn in Engagement Range of one or more enemy units, and may not declare shooting attacks or charges. A Broken unit receives -1 to hit rolls and -1 to wound rolls if it fights in the fight phase. (if it is charged by an enemy unit, for example).

Broken units wholly on or within terrain may re-roll their leadership test if they fail.

Any unit with an ability that limits modifiers to Attrition Tests instead automatically succeeds their leadership test if they must take it only because they are currently Broken and not because they have taken casualties. (E.g. the Angels of Death rule)

A unit with an ability that limits casualties taken due to morale instead may still act normally while Broken, but suffers a -1 to all hit rolls and wound rolls while Broken. (E.g. the Grim Resolve rule)