Switch Theme:

If Marines Are Properly Costed At 20 Points, How Many Points Should A Necron Warrior Be?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
If Marines Are Properly Costed At 20 Points, How Many Points Should A Necron Warrior Be?
40+ Points
35-39 Points
30-34 Points
25-29 Points
21-24 Points
20 Points
15-19 Points
10-14 Points
5-9 Points
4- Points

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern






Not at all as easy as comparing stats.

Is a 4+ save less useful than a 3+ save? Yes.

The marine has an extra wound, but outside of a nearby Apothecary, little in the way of getting back up after being all blown up.

With the right gear and right stratagem, I can have three units of Warriors brought on/redeployed pretty much where I wish. Marines, to the best of my knowledge, cannot.

My Warriors can be made further resilient with a Ghost Ark. Marines, again to the best of my knowledge, cannot.

I can use my Warriors to block your assault route to a C’Tan, allowing it to fart out Mortal Wounds and give you a really hard time. Marines cannot.

With the right Cryptek lurking, my Warriors can benefit from a welcome 5+ invulnerable. Marines cannot.

Necron anti-tank tends to have flat damage, or be D3+3. Marines, not so much. Eradicators (melts dudes, I think that’s the right name) can, but don’t have the range nor resilience my toys enjoy.

In short? You can’t really compare two units in a vacuum, especially in modern 40K where a large chunk of any winning strategy is the cunning application of buff bubbles and stratagems.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/02/21 20:10:03


 
Made in gb
[DCM]
Chief Deputy Sub Assistant Trainee Squig Handling Intern






 techsoldaten wrote:
Thematically, I always thought of these guys as T-800s, which would put them at or slightly above the level of a Marine.

I know that's not how they play on the tabletop, but it still sticks with me.


To be honest, I’m pretty sure an Astartes would make short work of a T-800, Model 101.

The T-800 for a start is fairly slow. Sure, it doesn’t tire, but then nor does the Astartes. In power armour, I’d say it’s a non-contest. Not quite grown man vs Toddler non-contest. But certainly grown man vs spotty teen non-contest.

Hmmmm.....I feel a slightly daft thread topic coming on....
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: