Switch Theme:

If Marines Are Properly Costed At 20 Points, How Many Points Should A Necron Warrior Be?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
If Marines Are Properly Costed At 20 Points, How Many Points Should A Necron Warrior Be?
40+ Points
35-39 Points
30-34 Points
25-29 Points
21-24 Points
20 Points
15-19 Points
10-14 Points
5-9 Points
4- Points

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






A space marine has never truely lived up to its proper power level on the table in any eddition I have played. Except in 5th eddtion there were some special army rule which allowed them to do well (Salamanders/BA/SW) I dont recall necrons at the time then but they couldn't have been great with no one really playing them. In 7th they were basically equal in power with a marine being harder to put down (not saying much) but the warrior having a much more useful weapon and being a bit cheaper with a lower initiative. When the super formations came out - they were - essentially equal.

The decision to make mini marines 2 wounds was a strange one but one that should have been there all along. A marine should be drastically better on the table than a warrior (which is essentially an undead citizen robot soul) A marine is literally a hyper specialized killing machine.

Whats funny is - I think this eddition is the first eddition to get the dynamic right. The Warriors edge if it has one should be technology and it should be deficient to a marine in several other ways. Finally they have got it right.

Then when we get to the elite troop level. Primaris marines/Immortals...yet again - we have the same discrepancy. The marine has a slight edge in both melee and overall durability but inferior tech - worse gun and worse ability to repair battle damage.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
 Sasori wrote:
Galas wrote:Exactly. As they are now, Warriors allow necron players to play a necron horde AND some of the more interesting stuff that they have gained in the past 20 years.

If you want that old warrior terminator fell you can spam Inmortals with support characters and I'll asure you, you'll feel the same. Put a blob of inmortals agaisnt a blob of space marine troop infantry and they'll shredd them.


Galas wrote:I can agree that Necron Praetorians and Lychguard could probably be tougther and more scary. I mean, they are really scary, but when compared with marine terminators they aren't that scary.


This is 100% where I am at right now. I really like where the Necron Warriors are right now. They've got better weapons that standard Tac marines, and the ability to get back up consistently while being cheap enough to bring as a horde. If I want a more elite style, I'll bring Warriors which feels much like the old playstyle in 4th did.

I do agree that I wish Lychguard and Praetorians were a bit tougher like Terminators

They are T5 Str 5. Terms are 4/4. Just have 3 wounds instead of 2. Terms also have 1 less attack. The only place the lych/pretorians are lacking is in their weapons - they don't have the option for str 8 attacks.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2021/02/24 19:22:37


 
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: