Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/04/06 18:13:13
Subject: Letting open-topped vehicles gain objective secured
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Basically if your infantry can shoot out of an open-topped vehicle, why can't that vehicle let the infantry inside hold the objective? Currently that would seem a-bit over-powered in some circumstances, but as a rule moving forward, I think it would help many squishy armies contend objectives by allowing transports the ability to hold an objective with objective-secured.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/04/06 18:31:11
Subject: Letting open-topped vehicles gain objective secured
|
 |
Humming Great Unclean One of Nurgle
|
bat702 wrote:Basically if your infantry can shoot out of an open-topped vehicle, why can't that vehicle let the infantry inside hold the objective? Currently that would seem a-bit over-powered in some circumstances, but as a rule moving forward, I think it would help many squishy armies contend objectives by allowing transports the ability to hold an objective with objective-secured.
Would it still count as just one model?
|
Clocks for the clockmaker! Cogs for the cog throne! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/04/06 18:46:26
Subject: Letting open-topped vehicles gain objective secured
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
It could count as the transport gaining objective secured and just be one model, or it could count as however many infantry with objective secured are inside the transport, not sure which would be better as far as balancing wise
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/04/07 11:03:03
Subject: Letting open-topped vehicles gain objective secured
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I would allow it to just be the transport - otherwise orks in battlewagons could prove somewhat powerful - which itself isn't a bad thing, but it's probably more balanced if it just has the chance to push non-objsec units off of objectives.
Thus the heirarchy would be:
Single models<squads><objsec transport><objsec squads>
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/04/08 09:18:01
Subject: Letting open-topped vehicles gain objective secured
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
I'm not 100% sure if this makes sense from a fluff perspective. When holding the objective, I've always pictured them as doing other stuff such as setting up scanners, flags, defensive positions, etc. Stuff which requires you to be out of the vehicle.
|
|
 |
 |
|