Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 H.B.M.C. wrote:
You can do that without the need for bespoke rules though.

Using your good Termy/'Stealer example, say rather than having two slightly different Deep Strike rules you had a single Deep Strike rule:

Deep Strike (X)

And "X" is the minimum inches away that the unit must be deployed. Most things would have Deep Strike (9), but some things, like super-sneaky Genestealers or appear-out-of-the-shadows Mandrakes could have Deep Strike (5), or something like that.

A single rule that allows variance within itself. It's built in.

Think this was mentioned further up. You could maintain the individual flavour still by giving different names but still calling out the same USR, e.g.

Genestealers - "They're Coming Out Of The Goddamn Walls" - unit has Deep Strike (5)
Mandrakes - "Strike From The Shadows" - unit has Deep Strike (5)

I think the fact that most people who played the editions with USRs still refer to those abilities by the USR names shows how useful they are. It absolutely eases the rules burden. My son has only played since 8th, and had no idea that things like Deep Strike, Feel No Pain, Objective Secured and so on were effectively still USRs but have just been given a different name each time they appear.

My big criticism of 9th edition would be that it seems to assume prior knowledge of previous editions like that. The codexes are massively disappointing from a fluff perspective in that respect. Looking back at my 6th edition CSM codex, each unit had a full page of text explaining the unit in the lore. That just doesn't exist any more, it just seems to be assumed knowledge that you've already read in previous editions. Nowadays you just get a little side box with barely a sentence in it. Before, the Heldrake entry went into all the details of how they are formed from a mutated and daemon-infused space marine fighter ship, and deep within it's core there is still a shrivelled husk of a pilot, whose cries of anguish are amplified and blared out as the screams of the monster he has become. I eagerly await the 9th edition version with a little blink-and-you'll-miss-it text box saying "dragon dinobot LOL"...