Switch Theme:

Why did Daemonkin fail in 40k?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Pious Palatine





Tacoma, WA, USA

I think at the most basic, Chaos in 40K is based around either the Legions or Daemons, with additional support to Renegades and things like Chaos Knights. Daemonkin was additional design requirements they just don’t have space for, especially given there are no Daemonkin models.

Since the rules now support daemonkin-style armies out-of-the-box, they don’t need to spend design resources on a codex for armies with no models. Instead, you get little helpings like Disciples of Belakor.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: