Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Lotta thoughts in this thread. I don't know much about NDAs or non-competes, but there's a lot here that I find suspect. For starters, the formatting is just garbage. Secondly, the document repeatedly used the term "GW" without defining it, which is really odd for a contract. Finally, there are just straight up typos, like the wrong words.

Lawyers can be sloppy, and lawyers make mistakes. I've seen obvious formatting errors in writing samples, submitted by people applying for lawyer jobs. Still, for something like this, a sentence like "The indemnity is this clause 6 shall..." is pretty bad.