Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:07:52
Subject: Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
With the new points released we see a bunch of removed upgrades costs. Seems a little akward to be honest. This trend of only paying for a models base cost and then chosing upgrades freely... yay or nay? It’s far to early to declare points cost redundant in favor of PL. it’s a recurring trend however.
|
His pattern of returning alive after being declared dead occurred often enough during Cain's career that the Munitorum made a special ruling that Ciaphas Cain is to never be considered dead, despite evidence to the contrary. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:16:58
Subject: Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Discriminating Deathmark Assassin
|
I love PL, many rules reference PL too.
|
213PL 60PL 12PL 9-17PL
(she/her) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:18:11
Subject: Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nerak wrote:With the new points released we see a bunch of removed upgrades costs. Seems a little akward to be honest. This trend of only paying for a models base cost and then chosing upgrades freely... yay or nay? It’s far to early to declare points cost redundant in favor of PL. it’s a recurring trend however.
I hate this. Cause competitive players will only ever take the best options.
Guard as an example, why take anything other than plasma?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:23:51
Subject: Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
This was the intention with 8th edition (which GW chickened out off after the AOS launch was such a disaster).
It's been coming for years.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2022/06/23 11:24:26
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:31:10
Subject: Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Oh good, yet another points v PL thread incoming. I'm sure this will be loads more interesting than all the other ones.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:34:18
Subject: Re:Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
The dark hollows of Kentucky
|
Didn't Fezzik already do this thread?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:47:57
Subject: Re:Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
I mean, this thread's been done about once a week since 8th ed dropped, and it's always exactly the same gak.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 11:51:08
Subject: Re:Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Enigmatic Chaos Sorcerer
The dark hollows of Kentucky
|
Nazrak wrote:
I mean, this thread's been done about once a week since 8th ed dropped, and it's always exactly the same gak.
Ok, recently. I mean, it's still on page 1 of General.....
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2022/06/23 12:02:52
Subject: Re:Is 40k heading PL only?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Fezziks thread is indeed still on the first page. Maybe I should have posted the new point development there instead of making a new thread. Mods feel free to lock this one.
|
His pattern of returning alive after being declared dead occurred often enough during Cain's career that the Munitorum made a special ruling that Ciaphas Cain is to never be considered dead, despite evidence to the contrary. |
|
 |
 |
|