Switch Theme:

Named Characters and [factions]. Is there a better way?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in nl
Dakka Veteran






Named characters always felt weird to me, so I personally don't use them. It just doesn't fit. But most can just be turned into wargear options or alternate sculpts for already existing models. There's no need to make all these special characters who somehow have this unique weapon of which there is only one in a whole galaxy or the like.

But then again, I'm also in favour of more simplified wargear in general, so no tiny differentiations of different versions of the same weapon that have one point more or less of something.
Made in nl
Dakka Veteran






Karol wrote:
 Dolnikan wrote:
Named characters always felt weird to me, so I personally don't use them. It just doesn't fit. But most can just be turned into wargear options or alternate sculpts for already existing models. There's no need to make all these special characters who somehow have this unique weapon of which there is only one in a whole galaxy or the like.

But then again, I'm also in favour of more simplified wargear in general, so no tiny differentiations of different versions of the same weapon that have one point more or less of something.

But there is only one Titan Sword, storm shield or the Blade of Antwer in the entire setting. They also happen to be carried by characters which or vastly superior to the non special characters version of HQ, for minimal pts cost.


Which makes no sense to me because there is no reason why there wouldn't be equivalent weapons laying around elsewhere. Sure, it would make 40k revolve less around central characters but to me, that seems more like a good thing. And besides, many special weapons are just normal weapons +1. They don't fundamentally change anything.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: