Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

And it's lower effort than I expected. Literally only 5 bullet points, one of which didn't even NEED to be addressed.

Chosen can take fists, so that is good.

404

Seems to have become normal when trying to access FAQs anymore.

Do you have something jamming up the file download? Seems fine at my end.

Catulle wrote:
Do you have something jamming up the file download? Seems fine at my end.

Nope. Two different devices, three different networks. All 404.



Found the issue. The WarCom site is linking an invalid URL from their dropdown menu.

Menu points to...
https://www.warhammer-community.com/en-us/faqs/

Valid URL is actually
https://www.warhammer-community.com/faqs/

Out of masochistic interest, what was the toughness of the dark apostle listed as in the codex, if they've had to correct it in the errata?

EviscerationPlague wrote:
And it's lower effort than I expected. Literally only 5 bullet points, one of which didn't even NEED to be addressed.

DE still waiting for the many FAQs we've asked many times, so GW lol

Crispy78 wrote:
Out of masochistic interest, what was the toughness of the dark apostle listed as in the codex, if they've had to correct it in the errata?

It was 4, but the dudes with him had 3. so majority T was 3, meaning running them was making the Apostol a chaos chaplain with t3.

Karol wrote:

Crispy78 wrote:
Out of masochistic interest, what was the toughness of the dark apostle listed as in the codex, if they've had to correct it in the errata?

It was 4, but the dudes with him had 3. so majority T was 3, meaning running them was making the Apostol a chaos chaplain with t3.

Ah, gotcha. Love how well they understand their own rules.

Crispy78 wrote:

Karol wrote:

Crispy78 wrote:
Out of masochistic interest, what was the toughness of the dark apostle listed as in the codex, if they've had to correct it in the errata?

It was 4, but the dudes with him had 3. so majority T was 3, meaning running them was making the Apostol a chaos chaplain with t3.

Ah, gotcha. Love how well they understand their own rules.

Well, you see, in the currently-in-development/just finished 10th edition rules, majority toughness has gone away (again), and wounds are assigned to individual models for resolution, not units. So it didn't occur to the writing team that they needed to know the 9th edition rules anymore.

I should probably indicate that's sarcasm, but I'm not 100% sure that it isn't true (or related to the truth).

Hey on the other hand the powerfist for chosen comes with no point costs. So this means it is a 1 in 5 option, you can't take on the champion because of the wording, but it is free. So not really an option, so more like an auto include.

The few changes mean that GW is happy with how the codex works.

Crispy78 wrote:
Out of masochistic interest, what was the toughness of the dark apostle listed as in the codex, if they've had to correct it in the errata?

T4 on the apostle
T3 on the little dudes

I call the disciples, "Chaos Nazarenos"... They are the 3rd and 4th in the command line of my BL army after Abby and the Apostle.