| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2022/09/06 04:40:51
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
So, GW introduced a new Daemonic Save characteristic.
Daemonic Invulnerablity: Instead of a normal Save characteristic, each LEGIONES DAEMONICA datasheet has a Daemonic Save characteristic. This characteristic has 2 values. The first characteristic is used when a melee attack is allocated to that model, while the second characteristic is used when a ranged attack is allocated to that model. In either case, the saving throw cannot be modified in any way.
They also changed the Armour of Scorn, the first part is now useless.
Armour of Scorn
- Each time an attack with a Damage characteristic of 1 is allocated to the bearer, add 1 to any saving throw made against that attack.
- Each time the bearer would lose a wound as a result of a mortal wound in the Psychic phase, roll one D6: on a 4+, that wound is not lost.
Classic GW 
|
|
|
 |
|
2022/09/06 06:05:58
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
What is your rules question?
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 08:28:51
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Lord of the Fleet
|
It's p5, of course there isn't a legit question.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 09:22:39
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
Am i right, or am i wrong ?
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 11:09:21
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Lord of the Fleet
|
Why does it matter to you? It's an oversight that'll be FAQed just like Enriched Reactors. In the meantime do your one-man circlejerk about how you spotted the oversight.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 11:17:08
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
It'll get faqd, it's not the only issue with unmodifiable elements in that book, and so the best use of them is to email gw.
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 12:08:39
Subject: Re:Armour of Scorn
|
|
Nihilistic Necron Lord
|
What else is there ?
|
|
|
|
|
2022/09/06 13:07:01
Subject: Armour of Scorn
|
|
[MOD]
Villanous Scum
|
A rules question? I dont see one here. If you want to post this kind of soap box stuff in the future do so in GD.
|
On parle toujours mal quand on n'a rien à dire. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
