Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'm back from my... "vacation" from dakka.

halonachos wrote:I would just like to let the group recognize that I did not vote for GND the way most of you guys did. There was little reason to lynch him yet a lot of you fellas just jumped on top of him for some reason I still do not get.

Some of you have said that it was because I was the more pro-town of the two. I still don't get that.

Doesn't prove anything, because they did it to protect you, because, well, you're all cultists.

TherVadam wrote:Well, if I really must explain my actions again, this is how it goes.

In Dayphase 1, there was a lot of confusion (as has been said again and again), but we agreed that we needed a lynch. Then, everyone started to vote for IGLannister at first because of being off-topic for a few posts, and then.... vote-hopping, was that it? I dunno, and in hindsight maybe he was pretty bad, but I didn't think so then. So, I took upon myself a goal, to save IGLannister, and for that I needed to get someone different lynched, so I picked GND, so as to disassociate myself from him, as I was grouped together with him by Drk_O (although, in hindsight, it probably does look very bad that I tried so hard to lynch someone who flipped town ), and from that point on, I drove to lynch GND, and honestly I don't entirely understand why other people voted for him either. The only reason why I wouldn't have been voting for Halonachos, is that he's actually posting.

It was because you all vote hopped to ginger nid dude, after halonachos was in danger.

IGLannister wrote:For the record, I didn't vote GND either.

You got other reasons for suspicion though. You're the only one that I think would have night killed brother stynier.

Paul Atreides wrote:Towards the end of dayphase 1, everyone started throwing around votes on either halo, IG or GND. I made the (maybe not so well thought out) decision at the time to lynch GND, since he had contributed less to the talking then the other 'candidates'.

What's the vote count right now anyway? We haven't seen one in like six pages. Has noone switched votes in all this time?

There were what, 4 or 5 votes to GND, Who, (except for TherVadam and me) were they? I'm going back to check.

I suspect most of them being culists.

Paul Atreides wrote:Huh, it was Drk_O, a bit earlier than the others.

That was before halo was in any danger of lynching.

halonachos wrote:So Drk_O instigated a vote against a loyal citizen? If he was first then I can't really say too much about that as it was the first day phase.

An RVS is just that.

Two hours left for this Day Phase.

Current Votes
VikingScott -1
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -1
Halonachos -1
IGLannister -2
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0

With 12 alive now 7 is required to lynch, which at the moment would be Lan.

Vote Log
Syph (Vote Halo)
Bishop (Vote LL)
Drk_O (Vote Lan)
Lan (Drk_O)
Lan (Unvote Drk_O)
Lan (Vote Scott)
Scott (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Vote Lan)
Vadem (Unvote Lan)
Halo (No Lynch)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Bishop (Unvote LL)
Halo (Vote Bishop)
LL (Vote 50)
NEW

VOTE: TUMBLE WEED

THAT IS BY FAR THE MOST DAEMONIC THING IN THE GAME THUS FAR!!!

As usual the squabling continued, before long they reached a stalemate. Then you all just sat around waiting for the stalemate to break. After a while you realised that something had to be done before the enemy killed more of you. Scott and Drk_O looked at each other, tired of waiting they leapt into action. Scott grabbed Lan and then Drk_O quickly ran up and stabbed him in the chest. Shocked you were all ready to jump on the two and claim justice, but you all stopped when you heard Lan's faint laugh.

"H-how did you know?" asked Lan. "We didn't" replied Drk_O. Lan laughed for a little while longer before death overcame him. The rest of you looked confused until Drk_O searched Lan to reveal several Chaotic Tatoos and a book full of Imperial Prayers, words crossed out and replaced in a way that mocked everything the Emperor represented.

"That was lucky" laughed Drk_O. Scott looked at him in disbelief. "You mean you weren't entirely sure?" he asked. "Nope" replied Drk_O.

Lan, or Lanny as he liked to be called, was a Cultist

Night phase begins, guys with abilities send them in

You didn't count my vote for the tumble weed...

So you wanted a 5 way tie?

I just want the tumble weed to die a violent death

Paul Atreides wrote:Page twelve to thirteen. When pressed to point out who he would lynch if he had to, this is his response

the_ferrett, page 13 wrote:Lan due to the votes hopping. Either he and Nachoes are very indecisive or they'e playing silly buggers. Either way it raises my hackles. Heretic behaviour, maybe not. Offputting - yep!

I skimmed through the whole thread yesterday. Now I'lladmit that this is a veeeery weak lead by itself. There was one more quote from ferrett on this very subject, but I couldn't find it now. I'll try again.

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:I'm testing something, so I'm not going to change my vote.

So in otherwords, I'm not really adding much atm.

Ohh and incase I get nightkilled, I'm just going to quote these posts. I'm testing something by doing so, I'll explain it if I don't die.

Drk_O then turned his attention to the tumbleweed that had become the center of attention over the last few days. Jealousy overcame him and he leapt at the weed. The Tumbleweed flew into the air, dodging Drk_O's insanity and returned to the ground. Drk_O chased it around before he finally cournered it and set it on fire.

The Tumbleweed cried manly tears for it would not see it's Tumbleweedwife or his Tumbleweedson, TumbleSteve, grow up and become a doctor like he had always dreamed of. He accepted his death, the Tumbleweed was a bigger man, even though he had been set on fire he held no grudge. He would simply die. He pittied Drk_O for he had to live with the guilt. The Tumbleweed slowly burnt away remembering the good times it had had in life.

TumbleJoe was a Tumbleweed

So, the day is over?

Yep ended back up there at Lan's death.

Well, at least I got Stynier.

And for the record, upon death I voided my bowels on Scott. Or at least in his general direction.

The Holy Romo is God, not your pathetic corpse you Imperial lapdogs.

Bleh...

*Voids on Scott*

I'm going to have to withdraw from the game.

Relative died and I have to go down to England for the funeral next week. Don't really have time for much Dakka sorry.

Bummer dude. My condolences.

Lord-Loss wrote:I'm going to have to withdraw from the game.

Relative died and I have to go down to England for the funeral next week. Don't really have time for much Dakka sorry.

Condolences mate. Hope the trip down is easy. We'll see you when you get back.

Sorry to hear about that LL, its always a bad time when that sort of thing happens.

I'm so sorry.

Surprisingly you manage to sleep well for once, nothing happened during the night. At least to your knowledge. Dispite the night being eerily calm and quiet you awake to a gruesome sight. Over the top of the door is Bishop hanging from the ceiling by his intestines and nailed to the wall. His eyes missing and instead replaced with two flashlight, turned one to appear as if his eyes were glowing. Chaotic emblems are carved into his face, a face which has been twisted into a creepy smile. On the ground below him was another corpse, you recognize the now disfigured face of Lord-Loss. Mutilated in the same manner as Bishop.

However one of his hands is in the pocket of his jacket. One of you reaches inside, everyone assuming that with his last strength he did this to give you all a message. Inside the pocket you find a sheet of paper with orders issued to Lord-Loss; fancy paper.

Although half of it is missing it mentions Bishop in it and advises Lord-Loss to be careful of him as he shows possible signs of having psychic abilities which may lead to Daemonic possession. It continues by mentioning the events of the world. Shocked at the news the letter has delivered you realise something.

Bishop was a Psyker
Lord-Loss was an Inquisitor of the Ordo Malleus


Daypahse Three Start

Current Votes
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -0
Arheiner -0
Fifty -0
Halonachos -0
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0

With 9 left alive, 5 are required to lynch.
The dayphase has two weeks from now ending on the 24th

This was a very awkward nightphase for me; I thought there was still a couple of days left to vote when it begun. But maybe it's a good thing I didn't vote, then it might have resulted in a tie.

So, lord-loss was an inquisitor and bishop really was the psyker. Were does that leave us? And sorry if I am being daft, but how could they kill two townies this night?

Thanks to Drk_O and scott, who nailed a cultist while most of us shuffled our feet. Does anyone disagree with me that this more or less clears them of all suspicion seeing as they could easily have withdrawn their votes at any time if they had kown they were threatening one of their own?

And Syphonius, it seems you were at least partially right all along. I am sorry I doubted you.

LL decided to quit the game for the sad reason he gave above.

On the contrary Paul, Daemons know who the cultists are.

I however, decided to try out something from the quote you got off the_ferrett, who was a daemon.

Vote: Halonachos

When I quoted the quotes before, I was trying to see if I could bluff out the cultists. However, I expected them to expect that, so I was going to not vote for Halo. HOWEVER, I expected them to expect that I would expect that!

Actually, I'm alive, which means Halo is a cultist. My death would have implicated Halo, so I am alive. Although, I might be alive, because the Cultist want Halo implicated by my logic.

I figure there's only one way to be sure for sure.

Death post:

My plan... worked... perffffff *bleh*

Lord-loss, yes, I would have said something kind too, but I couldn't find the words. I'd share his pain if I could.

Lord-loss and bishop, you will be missed, and avenged, not necessarily in that order!

I believe your theory has merit Drk_O, and the greatest chance of positive results.

Vote: Halonachoes

Drk_O you do realise that we had never had words with each other right?

Anywho, Paul you seem a little too eager to please people who vote. Looking at the GND vote, there really was no reason for you to follow that group in their vote, while you did get my back I can't question why still. With Drk's vote with little premise behind it you jumped right in and followed.

Vote: Paul Atreides

halonachos wrote:Drk_O you do realise that we had never had words with each other right?

Anywho, Paul you seem a little too eager to please people who vote. Looking at the GND vote, there really was no reason for you to follow that group in their vote, while you did get my back I can't question why still. With Drk's vote with little premise behind it you jumped right in and followed.

Vote: Paul Atreides

Desperate eh?

VOTE: Halonachos

Paul is still on my list...

I do not in anyway see your vote as unreasonable, halonachos.

But, for the record, I have been swinging back and forth between siding with syph or you for most of day two. With IG proven guilty, this lends strength to his case, and I would have voted for you in regardless of what anyone else said. But Drk_O has presented another good argument against you. I don't hitch on to other peoples votes, I hitch on to others ideas. There are several arguments against you, some of them quite insignificant by themselves, but all together they build a strong case against you.

But, I think of myself as being quite flexible. You are free to convince me of your innocence in anyway you see fit.

(Hmm, the only votes cast today are either against you or me. I wonder if we will be the prime targets for the next lynch. This game just got interesting.)

EDIT: I was ninja'd by syph, and wanted to specifically adress halo.

Well, Paul, if IG being a cultist lends strength to syphonius's argument then you are a cultist.

I wasn't using syphonius's list or reasoning at all in deciding my vote. I used my own reasoning because seeing as though I am no cultist and he deemed me to be so I am going to ignore most of his ideas.

I still have yet to see any clear arguments against me, just a bunch of people who really don't like me for some reason.

As to IG being a cultist it seemed logical, he did bandwagon and he didn't really do any legwork. Unfortunately we lost two major roles in this day so we have a tough job ahead of us.

So we have 9 players. About 3 cultists left and 1 rogue psyker left along with 1 demon if my estimates were true. That's majority so ouch, we need to be careful in who we choose.

Seeing as though you(paul) played similarly to IG I can further feel that you are the cultist. And by playing similarly I mean bandwagoning and having little explanation for it.

Also, viking and Drk voting for a cultist doesn't necessarily prove their innocence. We should still have one demon left alive, a demon who knows cultists and doesn't need them to win. Although all it takes is one simple cultist to be kicked out before someone may begin to trust them, once that trust is established they lead the group to kill another townie to give them anti-town majority. All they do then is agree with the remaining cultists and voila, cultist victory.

Although the day has come to this, the day halonachos finally is no longer needed because some demon has led the town against a cultist and tricked them all.

So yes Paul, your reasoning using syphonius's example is not very good. Because he implicated IG(whom I also implicated in Day One), vadem, you, and I that means that syphonius has picked out every single cultist right? Agreeing with syphonius only proves your guilt, not mine. Sorry syphonius, I don't agree with you and I know that must be very hard for you.

And Drk, explain your reasoning. I never argued against you and vice-versa, so how does you not getting night-killed prove my guilt?

halonachos wrote:Well, Paul, if IG being a cultist lends strength to syphonius's argument then you are a cultist.

I wasn't using syphonius's list or reasoning at all in deciding my vote. I used my own reasoning because seeing as though I am no cultist and he deemed me to be so I am going to ignore most of his ideas.

I still have yet to see any clear arguments against me, just a bunch of people who really don't like me for some reason.

As to IG being a cultist it seemed logical, he did bandwagon and he didn't really do any legwork. Unfortunately we lost two major roles in this day so we have a tough job ahead of us.

So we have 9 players. About 3 cultists left and 1 rogue psyker left along with 1 demon if my estimates were true. That's majority so ouch, we need to be careful in who we choose.

Seeing as though you(paul) played similarly to IG I can further feel that you are the cultist. And by playing similarly I mean bandwagoning and having little explanation for it.

Also, viking and Drk voting for a cultist doesn't necessarily prove their innocence. We should still have one demon left alive, a demon who knows cultists and doesn't need them to win. Although all it takes is one simple cultist to be kicked out before someone may begin to trust them, once that trust is established they lead the group to kill another townie to give them anti-town majority. All they do then is agree with the remaining cultists and voila, cultist victory.

Although the day has come to this, the day halonachos finally is no longer needed because some demon has led the town against a cultist and tricked them all.

So yes Paul, your reasoning using syphonius's example is not very good. Because he implicated IG(whom I also implicated in Day One), vadem, you, and I that means that syphonius has picked out every single cultist right? Agreeing with syphonius only proves your guilt, not mine. Sorry syphonius, I don't agree with you and I know that must be very hard for you.

And Drk, explain your reasoning. I never argued against you and vice-versa, so how does you not getting night-killed prove my guilt?

All the demons are gone...

Ferret quit, and Stynier was removed from Bishop right?

My argument against you is clear...? (So help me emperor if you try to bring up the "hole in my logic" again... )

Just because you say you're a townie doesn't mean you are!

See that part in red? I am on to you Paul and halo. If it is not true paul, oh well, you can see why I need to follow this. He basically told us his plan as far as I reckon.

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:On the contrary Paul, Daemons know who the cultists are.

I however, decided to try out something from the quote you got off the_ferrett, who was a daemon.

Vote: Halonachos

When I quoted the quotes before, I was trying to see if I could bluff out the cultists. However, I expected them to expect that, so I was going to not vote for Halo. HOWEVER, I expected them to expect that I would expect that!

Actually, I'm alive, which means Halo is a cultist. My death would have implicated Halo, so I am alive. Although, I might be alive, because the Cultist want Halo implicated by my logic.

I figure there's only one way to be sure for sure.

I see what you did there...

Not really, I get the concept, I just don't see why it would lead you to halo. (I need some more evidence [not really ])

Put halo when I meant paul!

Put halo when you meant paul?

Oh, we did get rid of the demons? I remember someone saying that stynier was gone last day phase, but I didn't get that. Also, ferrett was a demon? If so didn't the role get reassigned?

Also, how do we know that bishop was possessed? If he was he surely wouldn't of been night killed if the cultists thought he was would they?

Screw up in the post, had to edit.

Umm... pretty sure not_u confirmed that ferret's role was outta here.

They can't communicate, and it wouldn't be the first screw up towards Stynier.

Hrmm... Bishop was an easy night kill, obvious one, so it is hard to track. I think... Lemme do some scrounging.

Perhaps the rogue psyker is being possessed? *looks at halo*