40k Mafia Game - Inquisition - Finished Due To a Really Tired Inquisitor Getting Lucky :D

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**halonachos**

I'm not a rogue psyker, I'm an inquisitor.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

And let me guess, either paul or me is a cultist? Yeah. Right.

**halonachos**

No, you are a zebra.

My suspicion towards you has waned. Once ferrett was proven innocent it shot down my theory about you two being in cahoots. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't side with you if you were also a cultist or a demon because that would kill the team. If he was proven to be so and he palled along with you.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

I still find it funny that you think any of us are going to believe that YOU are the inquisitor...

So, halo, what do you think of us all? You obviously don't have to answer, though you're pretty much bent over either way...

**halonachos**

Yep, might as well.

I think Paul is a cultist, with that much I can agree with your list.

Vadem is iffy, but he missed the vote as well so I can't really tell.

Fifty has yet to post anything as has scarper I believe. In fact, I think we're at the majority of votes for those who actually play at the moment.

Drk is kind of iffy to me, but it wouldnt surprise me if he was a heathen.

I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.

Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.

What I can say is that it seems to me that during the second day you attacked one way while Drk and Paul had totally different ideas. The second day phase ended and IG was lynched proving to be a heretic, sad news indeed for I had trusted him. Yet I look at those who tried to disassociate themselves from IG and the list comes up as Drk and you syphonius. However, it could be that your plan was to sacrifice IG for the greater good as he had put himself in hot water at the start of the game and was more of a liability than an ally.

During the night phase bishop was lynched, bishop who had probed you and IG for information. You guys knew bishop was a threat and nixed him. This made you guys look innocent in my own opinionand made me and anybody else bishop had favored as being guilty.

Then Drk comes out with some foolish explanation of why his mortality is an explanation of my guilt and soon Paul follows suit using Drk's new explanation as a sole reason. You really were no surprise, your second day had started with your attack and your list.

Successfully adding IG(one of your own) to that list and adding three you knew were not cultists to the list meant that at the sacrifice of one of your companions would mean the death of 3 non-cultists(IG during day, bishop at night, halo during day, vadem/scott/fifty/scarper during the night).

This would leave 6 players, but some of them don't post or vote regularly(depending if you get scarper, fifty, or arheiner) if at all. Majority would be 4 and you would have 3 already, if scott was taken out during the night phase then the remaining 3(all being infrequent) would be easily voted out and a further night kill would ensure cultist victory as it would be 3 cultists to two people who don't even post.

**halonachos**

I may be reading too many Tom Clancy novels or just paranoid or a huge fan of conspiracies, but I think I nailed it. Unfortunately the best we could get is a tie if viking and vadem decided to agree with me.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

halonachos wrote:I may be reading too many Tom Clancy novels or just paranoid or a huge fan of conspiracies, but I think I nailed it. Unfortunately the best we could get is a tie if viking and vadem decided to agree with me.

halonachos wrote:Yep, might as well.

I think Paul is a cultist, with that much I can agree with your list.

Vadem is iffy, but he missed the vote as well so I can't really tell.

Fifty has yet to post anything as has scarper I believe. In fact, I think we're at the majority of votes for those who actually play at the moment.

Drk is kind of iffy to me, but it wouldnt surprise me if he was a heathen.

I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.

----------------------------------------------Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.

What I can say is that it seems to me that during the second day you attacked one way while Drk and Paul had totally different ideas. The second day phase ended and IG was lynched proving to be a heretic, sad news indeed for I had trusted him. Yet I look at those who tried to disassociate themselves from IG and the list comes up as Drk and you syphonius. However, it could be that your plan was to sacrifice IG for the greater good as he had put himself in hot water at the start of the game and was more of a liability than an ally.

----------------------------------------------During the night phase bishop was lynched, bishop who had probed you and IG for information. You guys knew bishop was a threat and nixed him. This made you guys look innocent in my own opinionand made me and anybody else bishop had favored as being guilty.

Then Drk comes out with some foolish explanation of why his mortality is an explanation of my guilt and soon Paul follows suit using Drk's new explanation as a sole reason. You really were no surprise, your second day had started with your attack and your list.

----------------------------------------------Successfully adding IG(one of your own) to that list and adding three you knew were not cultists to the list meant that at the sacrifice of one of your companions would mean the death of 3 non-cultists(IG during day, bishop at night, halo during day, vadem/scott/fifty/scarper during the night).

This would leave 6 players, but some of them don't post or vote regularly(depending if you get scarper, fifty, or arheiner) if at all. Majority would be 4 and you would have 3 already, if scott was taken out during the night phase then the remaining 3(all being infrequent) would be easily voted out and a further night kill would ensure cultist victory as it would be 3 cultists to two people who don't even post.

Well, for starters, we should PM the non-posters...

Down to business:

-----------------------------------------------1) Because my theory makes 110% more sense is the first thing that comes to mind. I still think paul is trying to avoid my justice by getting on my good side (which I don't have, two inquisitors dead in a chapel)...

-----------------------------------------------2) I really don't get this, could I get a quote?

-----------------------------------------------3) I "added" him to my list? When was this? He was on it early on... Of course now it is coming from your mouth now that everyone knows he is a cultist... I was on him and you from day one.

Methinks you killed Bishopgore, since he routed IGLannister up (as you claim) and you saw him as not only a threat, but also an easy kill.

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

halonachos wrote:Drk is kind of iffy to me

Jeez, I'll remember to wear some deoderant!

I can say this though. Paul + Drk + you=3 people. I think that is the amount of cultists left in the game and I had suspicions of Drk and you before. Paul not so much until now.

How do you know there are 3 cultists left?

Why is it that all of a sudden a person who advocated my survival(paul) and 1a person who never attempted to question me(Drk) are all of a sudden following the wishes of the one person I was so sure of being a cultist in the last day phase? 2Drk used "quotes" that I have yet to see and the fact that we never argued is odd, paul who, like I said, believed that I was valuable to the pro-town group now wants me dead, and you who never really had any clear reasoning behind your initial declaration of me being a cultist.

1I haven't had need to. Until the end of the last dayphase, I don't think I would have until later in the game.
2You haven't? I've quoted them twice or so. Check last page, my quote from the_ferrett is the one I'm using to implicate you. It's not cristal clear

halonachos wrote:I'm not a rogue psyker, I'm an inquisitor.

Prove it, who did you investigate?

**SagesStone**

For those thinking Stynier is gone, maybe he is

Maybe I'll wait until the end of the game to point out who was possessed.

Also this was nearly almost the shortest day phase ever.

Current Votes
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Drk_0blitr8r -0
Inquisitor_Syphonious -0
Paul Atreides -1
Arheiner -0
Fifty -0
Halonachos -3
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -0

With 9 left alive, 5 are required to lynch. Currently Halo would die.
The dayphase has 13days from now ending on the 24th.

Vote log
Drk_O (Vote Halo)
Paul (Vote Halo)
Halo (Vote Paul)
Syph (Vote Halo)

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:

How do you know there are 3 cultists left?

Methinks Paul and TherVadam exist... so... those are his buddies... One way he came to the conclusion, this is nothing though, since he can just say that he thought X existed at the beginning of the game.

Has the town ever won one of these? I know that you, not_u, and thor665 are veterans with this.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

not_u, what are we going to do about Scarper and Fifty, Arheiner, and TherVadam, they aren't exactly posting... (and if they all left, halo would be lynched!

)

PM's can be sent to them just so they post something, vote something. Dead weight impeding my investigations!

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

Yes, once in the Genestealer game I hosted, and only because they all gave up because I'm a horrible GM

**TherVadam**

OK, you know what? I'm tired of people implicating me. I'm giving up (temporarily) on the good of town, because I really believe you're trying to help, Syphonius, but I'm angry, ok? I don't want or expect this to end up in a lynch, but for the moment, this is the only thing that will appease me.

Rage-Vote: Inquisitor_Syphonius

And I expect that nobody except perhaps Halonachos, or Paul Atreides will vote with me, and I don't think they will (maybe Halo, but I would prefer he didn't, because that would associate us, again ). Barring them, I would be angry if anybody bandwagoned with me, because it's a ridiculous anti-town vote, and I will be the first to say that.

**TherVadam**

Now, for the more coherent post about the people not hounding me.

Paul: I can't tell if he's brilliant, or if he's suicidal. He's essentially bandwagoning with the person who is trying to kill him, so that he can delay his own death? Maybe he is a cultist. I need to check, but I had the impression that Paul was angry about Syphonius accusing him last day phase (but don't quote me on this), but today, now that the pro-town psyker is dead (who could previously protect Syphonius from night-kills), Paul only needs to survive one more dayphase to kill Syphonius.

Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?

Edited: Was wrong about what the psyker does. Will post again soon with new theory.
Edit 2: Did Strike-Out wrong.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

At least you didn't attempt to call it a "pressure vote"...

**TherVadam**

Lol. Anyway, I'ma wait a little bit for both inspiration and Not_U, but right now, I can say that Paul is not in anyway associated with me. I say this not to anger him, or create enemies, but we are simply not associated.

**Paul Atreides**

Hey, Vadam, you ruled out the possibility of brilliantly suicidal! But I digress. I have played this game like a moron in more ways than one.

Aren't we a fine gang, loose at each other like rabid dogs. I miss bishop and lord.

Halo, I too was dismayed when IG flipped heretic. I too had hoped he was loyal.

As you and Drk_O both said earlier, His death does not automatically clear his lynchers. One of them could be daemons. I however doubt this. The_ferret's role wasn't reused, and that leaves stynier (who has, note, already lost two of his potential possesses (How do you spell that?) in IG and Bishop. Do you think we might be dealing with three daemons? Not implying that you said that, merely curious.

Where are we really at this point? We have lost 5 loyalists, 2 from the game, and 3 baddies, 2 from the game. We are one inquisitor short, and we are all either deathly silent or snarling at each other.

Let us Assume for a moment there are three cultists left, one very possibly possessed by stynier. (I like your conspiracy hypothesis of me, syph and Drk_O as the cultists, but I must regretfully inform you that you're wrong. I am not a cultist, and my brother thinks I should write that repeatedly in caps-lock.) This leaves us with 6 loyalists and three baddies, and a 'margin of error' of one failure. you just gotta love the odds.

Shall we go through the alternatives?

Me: Bandwagoned on GND (although I will still say that decision was my own, no matter how wrong it later turned out to be). Defended IG (the shame of it). Didn't vote during dayphase 2 (this was a stupid mistake).

Scarper: Does anyone have anything to say on this subject?Does anyone have any suspicions on this subject?

Arheiner: (sorry if I spelt it wrong) Same as above.

TherVadam: I have yet to see what is so suspicious about him really. He jumped on the GND train sooner than me so that argument is weaker than against me.

VikingScott: What with him lynching IG this leaves the argument that he might be a daemon. Have we any strong leads to such a possibility?

Drk_O: Besides being his own unique self, only other lead the same as above. IF one of them is a daemon, who of them do you think it is?

Oops out of time! Halonachos and Syphonius, please fill in yourselves on this list, I have to go eat now, sorry!

**Paul Atreides**

Halo and syphonius, you both think I am a cultist. It's nice to see you agreeing to something. This way you'll both look stupid when I die, a great way to bond if ever there was one. Intriguing that you should claim to be the inquisitor Halo, I had a weak suspicion that you were implying that just that during dayphase 1 when you said that Lord-loss, Bishop or Drk_O probably were the inquisitors. Reading between the lines, ya know. But I am sorry, no matter how many times you decided not to read what Drk_O said, His argument does exist and the_ferret, Syph and probably others too have grouped you with IG, And look were he is now. Not saying this is concrete solid, nothing is after all.

Syphonius really just made himself lazy with his choice of target, the most safe and comfortable bunch of scapegoats you could possibly imagine. It really bothers me however how he insists on the infallability of his theory. Hey, Syph! the only ones supplied with the player roles are the cultists!

Then there's fifty of course. Now this is just a random thought, and not something I would lynch someone over ever, but how many see the connections in behavior between him and the_ferret?

I think I'm done rambling, and I am sure you all have lots of things to add to this list. I'll leave you to it.

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

TherVadam wrote:Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?

the_ferrett was a daemon, he was unsure whether to vote for Lanny or Haloz(I'm resisting the urge to call him Hally

). Daemons don't need cultsits, they need psykers. Daemons KNOW who the cultists are. To seem like a kewl town gai, you need to kill bad guys. Cultists ARE bad guys.

I propose that the_ferrett was trying to seem like the aformentioned kewl town gai, and couldn't decide between the two cultists with the most attention at that time. I tested this theory yesterday, by voting for Lanny, and it worked. So, with this in mind, I figure Halo has a 80% chance of being a cultist at this time.

**halonachos**

You see here's the thing, I can't really prove my inquisitorialness. I was trying to hide that fact since the beginning and tried "advising" the inquisitors to do the same and to tell the truth I only have 1 solid know for the cultists, one was syphonius and the other person I investigated was bishop. I do suspect you though Paul. As to your innocence I don't know, if I live through today and you do as well then I will have to investigate you.

I had a strong belief that LL was a good inquisitor so I attacked him and he attacked me, we tried to distance ourselves and it worked somewhat. Unfortunately I used my investigation and didn't shield bishop which is now a mistake that I must live with.

Drk: Didn't I point out the fact that ferrett was evil? Didn't I say that he was working with syphonius? Look at my claims of ferrett being evil and that syphonius is his ally. While stynier may still be around we don't have two demons on the field of play.

You unfortunately are also using quotes from a known demon as your evidence. You see syphonius has been using the "if I get night-killed lynch halon for me" as a nice cover. Syphonius obviously couldn't be night killed as he was a cultist so anytime a night kill was performed and he lived it "proved" his innocence due to his reasoning, and some fell for it.

The reason I am alive is because one, I have the night kill shield and two, if I went then syphonius would pop positive for guilt. Especially during the second night after I convicted him, but couldn't get the rest of you to believe me. When ferrett moved to protect him, I acknowledged Ferrett's guilt as well. I was so sure of him being a demon, but as he had to quit I didn't get to look at his role to confirm it, but not_u confirmed it for me.

I trusted IG so I didn't look at him and missed the mark on that one.

I do have to revise my math though. There should be 1 demon possessed player, no demons, and 3 cultists. The reason I think that there were only two demons is actually from not what anyone said, but what not_u said.

I only know 1 cultist and 1 townie, I suspect you(paul), vadem, and Drk.

Bishop's death was from a result of myself trying to distance myself from those who I thought to be pro-town. For the longest time I thought LL and bishop to be pro-town roles along with maybe Drk. So I tried my best to distance myself from all of them. Unfortunately, a night kill for any of them would of implicated my death, but I was sure that they had hid themselves well enough and the fact that no one believed anything I said would also help conceal them. For the most part it did, my belief that they were pro-town was correct, it's too bad LL had to leave and that bishop was night killed.

@ Paul:
You guys are calling me guilty built on the argument developed by a demon, you do know that right? This also makes me think that you and Drk could potentially be cultists.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:
TherVadam wrote:Drk_O: Can you please explain wth you're talking about?

the_ferrett was a daemon, he was unsure whether to vote for Lanny or Haloz(I'm resisting the urge to call him Hally ). Daemons don't need cultsits, they need psykers. Daemons KNOW who the cultists are. To seem like a kewl town gai, you need to kill bad guys. Cultists ARE bad guys.

I propose that the_ferrett was trying to seem like the aformentioned kewl town gai, and couldn't decide between the two cultists with the most attention at that time. I tested this theory yesterday, by voting for Lanny, and it worked. So, with this in mind, I figure Halo has a 80% chance of being a cultist at this time.

That's funny, I am literally 100% sure that he is a cultist, and that he is 100% not an inquisitor.

Ok, everyone, assign roles to people, that you think what they are, not including yourself, since that would be a waste of this... reasons aren't really necessary.

Drk_O-Townie
Halo-Cultist
Paul-Cultist
TherVadam-Cultist
Scarper-Cultist
Arheiner-Townie (spelling? In all fairness, you haven't posted in a while!

)
VikingScott-Townie
Fifty-Townie

Why do you think that there are three cultists halo? Slip of the tongue? Let the cat out of the bag?

...Or did I miss not_u announce it?

Alright, everyone go back and think long and hard, who do you think is the inquisitor? Read through the posts, who made a nice cover-up, who made radical theories, and backed them up?

Spoiler:

Just got back from the NJ iron maiden concert, yay!

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

To add to that-

Halonachos, we can easily agree that you were the least decisive, something that the inquisitor would be eh?

No. Something the inquisitor is. Perhaps subtly, though they would be very decisive, not sure to never rub people the wrong way like you.

**halonachos**

I think that there are 3 cultists because;

1) My original estimate was 4 and IG was one of them. Seeing as though IG is gone, that makes 3.

2) My original estimate of 4 comes from my thoughts that there would be 1 rogue psyker, 2 demons, and 4 cultists(each one is doubled).

3) I know that there were 2 demons because of not-u's wording about the second demon being gone. If there was more than two he would've said another.

4) Also, the rogue psyker can be possessed by up to two demons meaning that there was no less than 2 demons at the beginning.

If I recall correctly, I along with LL and Bishop had more radical theories along with back up. We were the more pro-town unlike your theories which were only proven thanks to the sacrifice of your team mate IG. My theories had a lot of merit and I successfully identified one demon and tried to save one innocent. You on the the other hand have killed one innocent and sacrificed one cultist to kill two more townies.

If I may quote Paul from before:

paul wrote:Then there's Halo's trap about the flaw in symphonius logic. Symph dismissed it, I don't know if you have, but I sure haven't. And besides, their exchanges up to this point can be broken down into Halo attempting to use logic and Symph calling him cultist.

and then there's you

syphonius wrote:Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.

Yes, you do mention later what I am about to say. You played as a townie to convince the others against actual townies and just because you mentioned this tactic doesn't mean you wouldn't use it. What better way to cover up what you are doing now by actively saying that it is a foolish tactic and make us think you wouldn't use it. You want me out so badly its not even funny.

Drk: Cultist/bad townie
Inq: Cultist
Paul: Cultist
scott:townie
vadem: cultist/bad townie
No talkers: townies.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

halonachos wrote:I think that there are 3 cultists because;

1) My original estimate was 4 and IG was one of them. Seeing as though IG is gone, that makes 3.

2) My original estimate of 4 comes from my thoughts that there would be 1 rogue psyker, 2 demons, and 4 cultists(each one is doubled).

3) I know that there were 2 demons because of not-u's wording about the second demon being gone. If there was more than two he would've said another.

4) Also, the rogue psyker can be possessed by up to two demons meaning that there was no less than 2 demons at the beginning.

If I recall correctly, I along with LL and Bishop had more radical theories along with back up. We were the more pro-town unlike your theories which were only proven thanks to the sacrifice of your team mate IG. My theories had a lot of merit and I successfully identified one demon and tried to save one innocent. You on the the other hand have killed one innocent and sacrificed one cultist to kill two more townies.

OK. You said that mine were only backed up by the sacrifice of my teamate... so my PRO-TOWN theories were proven thanks to the death of my teamate... the CULTIST?...

That last line, names, want, now. And evidence. You and LL were on the same page now? last post you said you were acting at ends... stop associating with people after their death and only then, it is not beneficial...

If I may quote Paul from before:

paul wrote:Then there's Halo's trap about the flaw in symphonius logic. Symph dismissed it, I don't know if you have, but I sure haven't. And besides, their exchanges up to this point can be broken down into Halo attempting to use logic and Symph calling him cultist.

How many times do I need to explain this? Seriously:

BrotherStynier didn't like IGLannister going off-topic, he thought it was detracting from the game.

He votes for him, QUITE CLEARLY SEEING THERE WAS ENOUGH TIME TO YO-YO THE VOTE THE OTHER WAY. Yet he scared Lanny straight, and finished his off-topic shenanigans.

and then there's you

syphonius wrote:Though if you directly helped in the lynching of halonachos... I would percieve you as innocent.

Don't take that out of context, that is so horribly out of context it isn't funny.

Yes, you do mention later what I am about to say. You played as a townie to convince the others against actual townies and just because you mentioned this tactic doesn't mean you wouldn't use it. What better way to cover up what you are doing now by actively saying that it is a foolish tactic and make us think you wouldn't use it. You want me out so badly its not even funny.

Err... why? I was on you before you even SLIGHTLY hinted at suspicion at me, after I cast the vote on you, you got defensive in a heart beat, clawing your way out of it.

Drk: Cultist/bad townie
Inq: Cultist
Paul: Cultist
scott:townie
vadem: cultist/bad townie
No talkers: townies.

I probably screwed up on the quotes somewhere, though I see it as you copy & pasting this, then putting me as a cultist, and trying to seperate yourself from them. The main conspirators anyway... Drk_O is also on to you like white on rice...

**halonachos**

1)You have no proof that you were on me before you voted for me.

2)Syphonius, your logic is incredibly lacking in the thought department(although thiscould be a ploy). If you were able to convince people to kill IG you would lose 1 cultist team mate, during the night phase you would kill 1 townie(which happened). During the next day phase you would use your last lynch vote to convince the town that you are correct in your theory and "accidentally" kill another townie followed by the night kill of another townie. Thus you would've effectively eliminated 3 townies for the price of one cultist.

3)You would have 3 cultists left with 1 rogue psyker giving 4 total anti-town. This would mean that you would have majority and win the game. Seeing as though this is the third day phase and victory is so near, why wouldn't you go for it?

4) I wasn't saying that LL was on the same page as me, the inquisitors don't know each other and neither does the psyker. All of three of us acted similarly though, we distanced ourselves for each other unknowingly by voting for one another and we also attempted to grill other players in a pro-town manner unlike Drk's "traps" which have never worked nor been truly revealed.

5) All demons act differently and if Stynier was just voting against IG because he was OT and not because he was a cultist then you really have no theory about the demon voting. You just know that Stynier voted against IG because he really hates OT and that's all. You tried to get some weird logic about him only voting for cultists and used that to describe all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched.

**halonachos**

Also, how many are there left for me to accuse?

I think you went ahead in time and copy and pasted my list only putting my name in place of yours.

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

halonachos wrote:1)You have no proof that you were on me before you voted for me.

2)Syphonius, your logic is incredibly lacking in the thought department(although thiscould be a ploy). If you were able to convince people to kill IG you would lose 1 cultist team mate, during the night phase you would kill 1 townie(which happened). During the next day phase you would use your last lynch vote to convince the town that you are correct in your theory and "accidentally" kill another townie followed by the night kill of another townie. Thus you would've effectively eliminated 3 townies for the price of one cultist.

3)You would have 3 cultists left with 1 rogue psyker giving 4 total anti-town. This would mean that you would have majority and win the game. Seeing as though this is the third day phase and victory is so near, why wouldn't you go for it?

4) I wasn't saying that LL was on the same page as me, the inquisitors don't know each other and neither does the psyker. All of three of us acted similarly though, we distanced ourselves for each other unknowingly by voting for one another and we also attempted to grill other players in a pro-town manner unlike Drk's "traps" which have never worked nor been truly revealed.

5) All demons act differently and if Stynier was just voting against IG because he was OT and not because he was a cultist then you really have no theory about the demon voting. You just know that Stynier voted against IG because he really hates OT and that's all. You tried to get some weird logic about him only voting for cultists and used that to describe all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched.

1) Not what I said. At all. I said I was on YOU... before you were on ME.

2) What does that have to do with anything? That has no backing other than "you're a cultist" ANY OF THE MANY that voted for IGLannister are in the same boat there...
You're acting like I was on the same team as IGLannister. As day one winded down, I assosciated with NONE of my suspected cultists. You, and the heretic parade, did the smoochy and basically cemented your association. Stop trying to dodge around it by declaring a "flaw in my logic" and explain yourself once.

3) Ok, so why am I a cultist, so help me emperor if you bring up that "flaw in my logic" one more time...

4) When did I imply that you did in my post? You're not the inquisitor by the way. I am. No wait... Drk_O is!... No wait

VikingScott is!

5) Ok, never said I did, whoopdy-doo! I never used THAT to get you lynched, there was a pile of evidence right next door...
"Weird logic about him only voting for cultist and used that to descrive all demons in the game. You then use that same logic to try to get me lynched"

What in emperor's name are you saying this time?

**Inquisitor_Syphonious**

halonachos wrote:Also, how many are there left for me to accuse?

I think you went ahead in time and copy and pasted my list only putting my name in place of yours.

Which means I am a rogue pskyer!

'

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

halonachos wrote:I only know 1 cultist and 1 townie, I suspect you(paul), vadem, and Drk.

Doood, WHO AND WHEN DID YOU INVESTIGATE!!! JUST SAY IT!!!

Like this. "Day One, I investigated TumbleweedJoe and he turned out to be a Tumbleweed"

[EDIT: Fixed the message]

**TherVadam**

Ok, well I think I'm going to avoid the Syphonius, Halonachos debate. I will agree with one when one of them kills the other. We're far enough now that killing your teammate seems kind of stupid.

Drk_O: I understood that one, I didn't understand the whole "Halonachos is a cultist because I expected him to expect me expecting his expectations" ... Although, I think that you are pro-town, maybe.... the other Inquisitor?

Paul_Atreides: See, this part is difficult, because I'm still considering most people innocent for the most part, like you. You've made some mistakes, but I think they were honest mistakes, and so I think you're a regular townie.

Which would make one cultist among the quiet people, which might explain why Not_U is hesitating to kill them off, and 1 cultist among Halonachos and Syphonius.

**Drk_Oblitr8r**

TherVadem, I was bluffing that I was bluffing, and they fell for it because they called my bluff that I was bluffing.

Basically, I tried to run someone over, but I knew they'd jump out of the way and land on the landmine I had placed earlier.