Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

OK, So let's say an assaulting unit assaults a vehicle with armour 13. A model with a thunderhammer succesfully "hits" the vehicle 2 times, but fails to cause any glancing or penetrating hits.

1. Is the vehicle stunned after simply being "hit"?

2. Is a penetrating or glancing "hit" required to stun the vehicle?

Has this come up for anyone else?

It's just the hit, no other result necessary.

i thought that it had to glance or penetrate. i thought it said that along with the result ie weapon damaged, imobalised etc it was also stunned. i dont think you need to just hit it, you have to glance or penetrate it.

Or beef, you could. . .read the rules?!?

A vehicle "struck" (i.e. hit) by a Thunderhammer suffer a "Crew Shaken" result along with any other damage.

Page 46 of the rulebook.

i dont have my codex at work so if yakface actually read what i said, which was I think as opposed to i know. which meens that i am of the opinion that. . . .