Switch Theme:

Varnish: Polyurethane v Dullcote  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in il
Fresh-Faced New User





Hi forum,

I'm conscious that the topic of varnish has been done a billion times, so I'll try and keep my questions as specific as possible:

1. Is there any concensus about whether brush-on polyurethane varnish (eg Vallejo) or Testor's Dullcote (which I believe is lacquer-based) provides the hardest / strongest / most durable level of protection for minis? My kids handle my marines, and my sole priority is stopping inevitable drops resulting in chips / scratches etc.

2. Regarding PU varnishes, I'm getting conflicting advice across the internet about the layering schedule. Some places (for instance Vallejo site) talks about leaving 4-24hours between layers, other sites talk about doing a 2nd layer within 2 hours. The issue seems to be that once PU dries, subsequent layers will not bind to it (in order to create a harder coat) unless the original layer is sanded (which I don't feel is appropriate given the scale of minis). Has anyone found the optimal time between layers in order to create the hardest overall protection?

Thanks,
LM
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: