Switch Theme:

The BBC, Murdoch, Cameron and some shady dealings?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




We all are. It's called having an opinion.

But believe it or not, I'm fairly happy otherwise with how the Government is doing. The £10,000 Tax Bracket ought to help me personally, which is a good thing. Plus since I don't claim a penny in benefits, I'm only gaining.

But it still amuses me that Cameron has already renegged on something, when it was pretty obvious just a soundbite at the time.
   
Made in gb
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





Lincolnshire

I tend not to follow politics, because stuff like this happens and it irritates me.

They're all liars and swindles, IMO.
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




Manchester UK

Mr Mystery wrote:We all are. It's called having an opinion.

Yes, but your opinion is that Cameron is a wash-out based on a piece of politick. He made it sound like he would offer a referendum to reverse the Lisbon Treaty in order to placate some of the more rabid euroskeptics in his party. He was still in a period when he felt he needed to 'take the party with him' at that time. It's probably his biggest failing - he shouldn't have cared, he should have just continued to broaden the party's appeal and tried not to worry about the fringe. But he DID clarify his position prior to the election, so what's the big deal? Let me ask you a question - did you still vote Labour at the last election? Even after the dodgy circumstances surrounding the Iraq war, suggestions of complicity in torture, extraordinary rendition, cash for peerages, massive immigration problems...? Blair and Brown were involved in some pretty serious deceptions - did you consider them 'wash-outs' too? Or did you just vote along tribal lines?

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2010/08/30 22:18:56


 Cheesecat wrote:
 purplefood wrote:
I find myself agreeing with Albatross far too often these days...

I almost always agree with Albatross, I can't see why anyone wouldn't.


 Crazy_Carnifex wrote:

Okay, so the male version of "Cougar" is now officially "Albatross".
 
   
 
Forum Index » Off-Topic Forum
Go to: