Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Dark Eldar /need/ to go first, at least when I play them.

When he strands my hard melee hitters, I struggle, so its better when he strands them right in front of his face.

 gummyofallbears wrote:
Dark Eldar /need/ to go first, at least when I play them.

When he strands my hard melee hitters, I struggle, so its better when he strands them right in front of his face.

Going first is important though not critical if you just remember your 42.1" measurement at all times. being seized on happens as i found out and if you keep the distance you need to, life is good. Even the damage they do will be mitigated in volume to a trickle and you can afford a trickle.

Although shooty Dark eldar is a thing as well and many people play it that way instead. I dont because I prefer to attack the weakest stat in all of 40K as directly as possible.

Come on, stop the circle jerk...

You've admitted that you don't even play regular 40k and you're just agreeing in circles with Blackie while every other reasonable poster (except me) has left the thread.

I guess that means i should leave the thread though, bye.

Take you ball and leave Morgoth. it's fine. It won't make you any less wrong. it will just make you feel better and there's something to be said for feeling better after a good beating.

Just saying.