Switch Theme:

Swarmlord meets Primarch  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in mx
Towering Hierophant Bio-Titan




Mexico

 Deadshot wrote:
Tyran wrote:
The Swarmlord isn't going to duel Guilliman, as neither would force a duel unless they are confident they will win it.



Why not? The Swarmlord's principal use is as a force multiplier, to maximise strategy and control over the swarm but other Hive Tyrants and Dominitrixes are able to do such a thing.

What you're describing is simple risk vs reward. For Guilliman, the risk is death and dooming the Imperium to inferior leadership and demoralisation, with the reward being killing the Swarmlord but not ending the threat entirely.

For the Swarmlord, the risk is death, and reabsorbtion back into the Hive. The reward is completely breaking the enemy morale and leadership, absorbing the incredible biomass and enhancing the swarm's physical and intellectual prowess unfathomably, and destroying the biggest threat to the Tyranid race from its greatest enemy.


Seems like a no brainer to me.


Because the Swarmlord is a force multiplier, not a beatstick. If the Swarmlord wants Guilliman dead, it will send something with far better odds, like a bio-titan. You don't expose your king to kill another king unless you are sure the gambit will work or have nothing better than the king left.
   
Made in us
Norn Queen






SomeRandomEvilGuy wrote:

Lance845 wrote:http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Fall_of_Shadowbrink

What happens when Nids fight deamons.

One internally inconsistent battle between a Hive Fleet and a piddly four Greater Daemons. One could just as easily say that Ka'bandha wrecking Tyranids in the Baal System demonstrates what happens when Tyranids fight Daemons.

Games Workshop aren't going to have a situation whereby one faction will always dominate another faction.


The full story isn't "a piddly four Greater Daemons". The artifact once unleashed pours massive amounts of deamons out of the warp from all 4 factions being lead by the 4 greater deamons. Find other examples in the lore of how horrible it is for anyone to fight against a full blown deamonic incursion lead by all 4 groups of deamons and then call it "piddly".


These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
 
   
Made in us
Stealthy Sanctus Slipping in His Blade





SomeRandomEvilGuy wrote:
 Carnikang wrote:
I don't know if I would call it that. They do have genetic variants that act like leader beasts, and are usually solitary aside from subordinates (Red Terror, Old One Eye, DeathLeaper, Broodlords, etc.). That and in the lore, variant/evolutionary mutations have happened surronding other Hive Tyrants and Warriors, coming out to appear as characters, despite being just another chasis with a fancy new biomorph and a little extra exp. The Swarmlord could just be a leader of leaders, and as such is afforded greater autonomy from the Hive Mind because of it's sheer mental and psychic might combined to make it unique. Yet not, as it's supposed that the Swarmlord can be present in many places at once across the galaxy if need be.

They're faceless bodies, but there are always some sort of characterizations with them.

I don't think of any of them as characters though. Aside from the Swarmlord and Patriarchs (which admittedly I had forgotten about) they don't have personalities or anything. They're used as stand-ins for characters but since they can die and be reborn they're likely to lose in fluff pieces against actual characters. The autonomy of the Swarmlord is weird and not very well explained. Why is it the only one allowed such autonomy? Does it risk Tyranids breaking off?


I think it has to do with the fact that the Hive Mind is the collective mental consciousness of the Hive. Synapse Creatures have more Autonomy than the lesser beasts who need synapse, but the 'characters' have even greater Autonomy. Then again, Old One Eye, and the Red Terror, need Synapse to function with the Hive Fleet. The Deathleaper requires it for in battle coordination, but functions well on it's own outside of the influence of the Hive Mind. Most Lictors and Genestealers function fine outside of the Hive Minds influence as well.
Going back to Old One Eye, on Maccrage still as far as I know. He 'leads' the lesser Tyranids that still infest parts of that world, but he's not mentally strong/intelligent enough to function as a conduit of the Hive Mind. He's Autonomous, but he's not when a part of the swarm.

The same could be said of the Swarmlord, but he's also autonomous within the swarm. It could function without them, not just because of synapse being innate, but because it has a wealth of knowledge to work with, because it's the oldest. It's mentally stronger and more adept. This allows for flexibility on the fly, while with other Tyrants it would be a slower adjustment as they absorb the changes. Thinking on it, a lot of Tyrants should function closer to the Swarmlord, if they'd survived battle for centuries of experience to accumulate, for that to be passed on as their conscious is reabsorbed and used in another body. It's weird that they haven't made not of that. Tyrants that survive continually as a physical being seem to absorb information and grow in cunning, using better tactics. But it's like a hard reset when they get turned into slurry.

Maybe the Swarmlord is the Hive Mind's answer to that, a back up file of the entire swarm's knowledge. It only needs one creature to do this, and to act as the guiding conscious within it's bounds. Giving this Autonomy to more creatures would likely create more diverging thoughts/tactics, but would it create such a division to create another faction within the swarm? And what if it has? What if it's already happened and it's a change of thought process within the swarm, requiring it to consume the entirety of the rest of the Hive Mind to change it? What if that's what's happening with Hive fleet Hydra? They've bypassed ripe worlds to attack other Hive Fleets.

What if the Refugee Theory AND the Tiny Portion Theory are both right? What if what we've seen is not just a bunch of smaller hive fleets running, but a splinter of the Hive Mind that has diverged and begun to think differently, and lost the battle to control the Tyranid Race as a whole. The rest follow, devouring the splinter Hive Mind, and absorbing all of their knowledge and biomass that has been gathered thus far?

Now I'm rambling.

PourSpelur wrote:
It's fully within the rules for me to look up your Facebook page, find out your dear Mother Gladys is single, take her on a lovely date, and tell you all the details of our hot, sweaty, animal sex during your psychic phase.
I mean, fifty bucks is on the line.
There's no rule that says I can't.
Hive Fleet Hercual - 6760pts
Hazaak Dynasty - 3400 pts
Seraphon - 4600pts
 
   
Made in us
Norn Queen






It's been theorized, and is pretty likely considering how often tyranids are engaged in battles, that they spawn multiple swarm lords at the same time. Just never more then one at a time in a single conflict.


These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Background
Go to: