Haemonculus Splinter Pistol and the Models Without Rules Flowchart

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**doctortom**

BaconCatBug wrote:
The lack of Vect (and the Doom of Malan'tai and some others I am sure aren't there but had rules in the past) in the Index is proof enough that the argument of "People had those models in the past therefore EVERY POSSIBLE COMBINATION must be possible, rules be damned" has no merit.

Pretty sure that one of the Tyranid Warrior old loadouts wasn't included in the index or codex either, but I can't remember which one. Might have been a Shrike loadout now I think about it.

It's not every possible combination, but most if not all the combinations that were available in 7th edition codexes were included in the different indexes (which, unfortunately, Vect was not. Maybe Forgeworld will put him out if GW isn't going to do something with him.)

Automatically Appended Next Post:

nekooni wrote:
BaconCatBug wrote:
The lack of Vect (and the Doom of Malan'tai and some others I am sure aren't there but had rules in the past) in the Index is proof enough that the argument of "People had those models in the past therefore EVERY POSSIBLE COMBINATION must be possible, rules be damned" has no merit.

Pretty sure that one of the Tyranid Warrior old loadouts wasn't included in the index or codex either, but I can't remember which one. Might have been a Shrike loadout now I think about it.

Who claimed that every possible combination must be possible? Or is this just another of your strawmen?

The latter, I think.