Switch Theme:

Does a codex have to have fluff?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
Do you need fluff in your codex?
Yes, I want the fluff for my army in my book/ebook
No, but I want the same amount and quality of fluff available elsewhere (official webpage/dedicated books)
No, I don't care about the fluff that can be found in codices

View results
Author Message
    Subject: Advert
[Up]
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




[Post New] 2019/10/03 19:21:12
    Subject: Does a codex have to have fluff?
[Up]
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




 ClockworkZion wrote:
Slayer-Fan123 wrote:
 ClockworkZion wrote:
Anyone who claims "no one" cares about the fluff of the knights should hit up their number one fan: Duncan Rhodes. They've used his fanboying about the lore as a joke in the renegade and chaode knight releases.

Absolute statements regsrding what the community does not like are almost always wrong.

Unless it's about hating 7th ed.

Don't even get me started on how bad the Chaos Knight release was. All that was needed was maybe 2 pages dedicated to rules and how to switch keywords, and then maybe an extra ten on the fall of Knights or how they became Renegades. What we have now is basically an insult if you think about it.

Renegades was pretty weak overall, the new book is better, even if it's lacking some on the knights who serve individual gods.

They really could've handled that with 6 rules for the four Chaos Gods, unaligned, and more "renegade" Knights that function kinda like Freeblades I guess. I haven't bothered to really try and make that work though as I'm so preoccupied with my job and nobody playing anything in the proposed rules forum...why bother?
CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
[Post New] 2019/10/03 20:09:29
    Subject: Does a codex have to have fluff?
[Up]
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka




 ClockworkZion wrote:
Anyone who claims "no one" cares about the fluff of the knights should hit up their number one fan: Duncan Rhodes. They've used his fanboying about the lore as a joke in the renegade and chaode knight releases.

Absolute statements regsrding what the community does not like are almost always wrong.

Unless it's about hating 7th ed.

Sorry my man I'd take 7th over 8th any day of the week.
tremere47-fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate, leads to triple riptide spam  
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: