Switch Theme:

Do GW actually collect their own armies?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut



Still trying to operate tape cassettes

I've noticed in the past few UK WD battlereports (since the change of style a few months back), that the army composition pages actually feature repeats of the same miniature. For those of you not familiar, rather than photographing the minis en masse on a table, there are now seperate photos of each squad, vehicle etc. with no back-drop.

The odd thing is that many of the troopers who make up the squads are actually in featured in the pictures of other squads. During battles, the 'action shots' (ie close ups of individual events) only need to feature a few minis, and these photos are taken after the battle has been played anyway.

This basically begs the question, are GW actually bothering to create entire armies for their studio any more? If so, they're basically giving the two fingered salute to evreyone out there who collects the models, and is spurred on by the company to produce well painted, well 'balanced', and, to this end, expensive armies.


I Ate Your Bees 
   
Made in au
Lethal Lhamean






I dont read WD, but it wouldnt surprise me.
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in southern England.

They're not very well paid and probably can't afford to build up whole armies.

Petition to stop ratification of EU Article 13 on Internet Copyright

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in de
Rampaging Carnifex






Franconia

The Eavy Metal team just paints one army with not many options. And the game designers usually use them because they are just better painted as their own ones. It could be that the point size decrased in the last years but I don't like to check all my white dwarfs for any evidence. But the battlereports are just for show anyways so why should we care?

I know when it is closing time. - Rascal Mod

"Some people measure common sense with a ruler others with a potato."- Making Money Terry Pratchett
"what's with all the hate go paint something you lazy bastards" - NAVARRO
"You don't need pants for the victory dance." -BAWTRM
 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Baltimore, MD

Hmm, i can think of a couple of egregious examples of photoshopping in white dwarf, though I can't think of a battle report that suffered it lately. 

1) The zombie pirates regiment from last summer only had two ranks converted, the rest was all photoshopped in.
2) The sample 1500 pt vostroyon army from this spring had duplicate squads in it.  They didn't even reshuffle the squad and take a new picture, the two squads looked identical.  I'm pretty sure this army was used in a battle report.
3) Not from white dwarf, but the infamous Cadian 6th picture from Codex: Imperial Guard.  Though even the bitterest foe of GW has to let that one slide.

This months battle report showed a "team photo" with backdrop, so I'm pretty confident that they're legitimate.  Don't forget that battle reports exist to provide a narrative, they in no way represent an actual game of warhammer.  I guess the closest comparision I can think of is that nobody complains that the Harlem Globetrotters win every game.  They enjoy watching an entertaining event, and even if there is little drama, the artistry makes up for it.  Heck, people watch pro wrestling, and that's basically a soap opera for adolescent men.  I love WD battle reports because they show interesting looking armies, and are written well with plenty of photos.

I agree that there is a certain level of contempt towards gamers in advertising their product, and not even buying a lot for their demos.  I think that at least with Vostroyans, there was never a serious attempt to get people to build entire armies of them.  Virtually all sales have been for inducted guardsmen/grenadiers/veterans/command squads/etc. 

My Painted Armies
: Co. B, 37th Praetorian IG: 11,000pts
Cygnar: 350pts
KOW Ogres: 4500 points
Loyalist Emperor's Children: 2500 points 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran






Yeah, they probably play other games like WM, Dark Ages and Confrontation.  They are all "closet" players.

I think I'm going to start a charity for the terminally stupid. You can be our spokes person. -- H.B.M.C.

"I remember my dream now, why I dug the holes."
- Jim, The Walking Dead 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




If you got to paid to play with minis someone else built and painted would you bother to collect and paint more yourself? Personally, I'd just go home and night and spend more time doing something more productive than modeling.
   
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: