Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
I made an oil fuelled power station in Tekkit once. It had 4 turbines. I tested a single one and it produced about 512 EU per second when the combustion engine was running at green. I made a vid about it on youtube, actually. And it was mega-efficient. It kept itself fed and could be turned on and off by just 4 switches (I used a hell of a lot of wireless transmitters/receivers. About 20 per turbine, I think).
Currently attempting to put together a homebrew non-canon Space Marine chapter. If I can be bothered to getting around to painting the models and putting the things together of course...
Thanks Dark, will give it a look. And for generators, the best possible one is a condenser creating coal funneled to an array of Generators. Free, risk-free, more efficient than a full-power Nuclear Plant, and more compact too. Only downside is noise.
FISH TANK
Spoiler:
from the front
from the back
from the top
from the front
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2012/08/24 17:02:57
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
You sure? My power plant produces nearly 2048 EU per second at maximum output. With just 4 turbines. And it is also very quiet. Near silent, actually, as it uses a lot of engines to do the work. Engines make zero noise, and refineries make next to nothing. If you want to look at the video, here's the link. I apologize in advance for the atrocious sound; I don't have a very good quality microphone.
I'm worried I'll get a lot of stick for this.
Currently attempting to put together a homebrew non-canon Space Marine chapter. If I can be bothered to getting around to painting the models and putting the things together of course...
I was born in England. Lincoln. I lived for 7 years in Clitheroe.
Currently attempting to put together a homebrew non-canon Space Marine chapter. If I can be bothered to getting around to painting the models and putting the things together of course...
I couldn't tell you, it wasn't calculated out because I'm lazy I linked it through an energy link and used a compressor and then stuck a max-sized quarry to the end, and the quarry was still at maximum speed.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
I just spent a long time reworking the aesthetics of one of the six mountains in my new area... It's a lot more work to do that than one might think, as I was dealing with farms, water, and all four walls plus floor and ceilings in all the rooms -.-
Ah well. It's done now. Need to build to the fifth mountain soon.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/24 19:37:48
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
I've been demolishing houses (with permission, of course) and stilling water. You know when you destroy a block around y=63 and the sea beneath it means it won't flow properly? So annoying.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/24 20:09:50
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
He said he is going to build one...
So it probably isn't there yet...
Dakka Bingo! By Ouze "You are the best at flying things"-Kanluwen
"Further proof that Purple is a fething brilliant super villain " -KingCracker
"Purp.. Im pretty sure I have a gun than can reach you...."-Nicorex
"That's not really an apocalypse. That's just Europe."-Grakmar
"almost as good as winning free cake at the tea drinking contest for an Englishman." -Reds8n
Seal up your lips and give no words but mum.
Equip, Reload. Do violence.
Watch for Gerry.
Don't get me wrong, I'll gladly deliver it-- I have more than enough sand anyway-- I just dunno where to deliver it to.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/08/25 19:04:34
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
Some peoples' names differ rather drastically... like Iustis/Not_U
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/08/25 20:18:36
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
Does anyone here use tekkit? If so i need help with a conundrum, i was walking along a beach when a crocodile decides to take a chomp on me and now my game is stuck in 3rd person instead of 1st person view...... is there a key i can press to go back to first person as its made minecraft a heck of a lot harder to do.
Lots of people here use Tekkit. They keep bugging me about it, too.
Ask them.
We don't use Tekkit on the server though-- it's a Dakka server, and they don't want any more instability than normal for minecraft.
The people in the past who convinced themselves to do unspeakable things were no less human than you or I. They made their decisions; the only thing that prevents history from repeating itself is making different ones.
-- Adam Serwer
My blog
n0t_u wrote:I expected this to be douchey from the title, surprisingly it's not really. Basic stuff, but not that bad.
I can't decide whether I like or dislike the fact I built half of those months ago
DS:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Plotr06#+D+++A++++/eWD251R+++T(Ot)DM+ JB: I like the concept of a free Shrike roaming through the treetops of the jungle. I'm not sure that I like the idea of a real Shrike sitting on my couch eating my Skittles. corpsesarefun: Thank god I missed be nice to shrike day. greenskin lynn: because of all the skittles and soda, you basically live off sugar water, like some sort of freakish human-hummingbird hybrid.
Tazz Azrael wrote: Does anyone here use tekkit? If so i need help with a conundrum, i was walking along a beach when a crocodile decides to take a chomp on me and now my game is stuck in 3rd person instead of 1st person view...... is there a key i can press to go back to first person as its made minecraft a heck of a lot harder to do.
does tekkit have Mo Creatures now?
Oh, and I play both technic and tekkit (less oten, though), so...
But that has NEVER happened to me before, I mean the stuck-in-3rd-person thing, so I'm guessing it's a bug
F5 changes the POV you are in. It should do anyway.
Currently attempting to put together a homebrew non-canon Space Marine chapter. If I can be bothered to getting around to painting the models and putting the things together of course...
I used to use Tekkit/Technic pack. Granted it is easier to get a bunch of mods working together but it doesn't really allow for any changes. I quite like the forestry mod which is now no longer included so I pretty much have installed (probably) all the Technic mods and alot more manually and its working pretty well. I think I have 47 mods running together atm.
When the rich rage war it's the poor who die
Armies I have: Chaos Space Marines, Tau, Necrons, High Elves
Armies I want:Lizardmen, Warriors Of Chaos, Dark Eldar
Armies I may get: Dark Angels, Tomb Kings, Vampire Counts
I linked it through an energy link and used a compressor and then stuck a max-sized quarry to the end, and the quarry was still at maximum speed.
When the rich rage war it's the poor who die