Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 02:22:47
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
HQ - 280 Space Marine Librarian (140) terminator armour; storm shield. Space Marine Librarian (140) terminator armour; storm shield. Troops - 410 5 Scout Marines (75) Sergeant. 5 Scout Marines (75) Sergeant. 5 Tactical Marines (90) Sergeant. 5 Tactical Marines (90) Sergeant. Razorback (40) Razorback (40) Fast Attack - 465 Stormtalon (155) Typhoon Missile Launcher. Stormtalon (155) Typhoon Missile Launcher. Stormtalon (155) skyhammer missile launcher. Heavy Support - 840 Predator (120) Lascannon Sponsons. Predator (120) Lascannon Sponsons. Predator (120) Lascannon Sponsons. Land Raider Redeemer (240) Land Raider Redeemer (240) The list takes two Redeemers to compensate for the comparative weakness in infantry - I know that they die quickly, but they might hold on long enough to disembark a scout marine squad onto an objective, last turn. I guess this list is an extremist move away from the troop-based shift that 6th edition brought on. I said "I want more tanks" rather than "I'll take more infantry".
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2012/10/11 02:33:55
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 12:29:30
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
If you want more tanks, why not have a master of the forge as a HQ. cover save and can repair.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 11:32:15
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Utilizing Careful Highlighting
|
Why term libbys?
LRs are 250 base.
Perhaps you might pull out some wins, certainly is some good armour there.
|
Aurora SMs in 5th Ed (18 wins, 3 draws, 13 losses)
1st in Lords of Terra Open (Sydney) 2012
Aurora SMs in 6th Ed (3 wins, 0 draws, 5 losses))
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 12:29:21
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
sam918 wrote:If you want more tanks, why not have a master of the forge as a HQ. cover save and can repair.
And I'm pretty sure they can do it from safely inside the LR. MotF would also be very fluffy for this list, as save a few points.
It looks balanced for what it is. You want tanks, you took tanks. You are light on troops, but you know that. You seem to have a decent mix of horde and armor guns. I might pick up some multimeltas on the LRs, they can be nice to have. I would also advocate HK missiles for everything. You first turn should be to saturate fire on every AT thing in the opposing side.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 13:53:45
Subject: Re:2k SM
|
 |
Cog in the Machine
|
Why spend all those points on the librarians? They dont really mesh well with the rest of the list IMO. What are they planned to be used for?
Also taking scouts for objective campers and not taking camo cloaks for 15pts is a mistake. A 2+ gtg cover save is well worth it.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/11 14:21:32
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Space Marine Scout with Sniper Rifle
Lincoln, UK
|
Loricatus Aurora wrote:Why term libbys?
LRs are 250 base.
Perhaps you might pull out some wins, certainly is some good armour there.
Actually Land Raider Redeemers are in fact 240 points.
Looks like a list that would do well to me. So long as you focus on anti-tank parts of the enemy you should be able to breeze through.
EDIT: I would drop the terminator armour on the Libbys and let them ride in the tanks casting powers.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/11 14:22:57
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 00:05:47
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Boom! Leman Russ Commander
|
They can't cast powers in the LR - it has no firepoints
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/13 06:57:48
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Utilizing Careful Highlighting
|
Where are redeemers 240 points? What have i missed?
|
Aurora SMs in 5th Ed (18 wins, 3 draws, 13 losses)
1st in Lords of Terra Open (Sydney) 2012
Aurora SMs in 6th Ed (3 wins, 0 draws, 5 losses))
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/13 12:36:15
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
Unless you have a misprinted codex, Page 143. That's without the MM though, which is almost required. I'm not sure if they were first introduced in another place at a different cost, but I think they have always been 240 base.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0020/10/13 12:43:56
Subject: Re:2k SM
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
this if for vanilla marines, if your looking at a BA book their points are slightly different on acount of being able to deep strike......Suprise LANDRAIDER!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0040/10/13 17:12:21
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Crushing Black Templar Crusader Pilot
|
The razorbacks need to be dedicated transports (scouts can't take them). So as is this list is not legal. Automatically Appended Next Post: Disregard this message, didn't see the tacts...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/13 17:14:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/14 20:56:52
Subject: 2k SM
|
 |
Utilizing Careful Highlighting
|
Nevelon wrote:
Unless you have a misprinted codex, Page 143. That's without the MM though, which is almost required. I'm not sure if they were first introduced in another place at a different cost, but I think they have always been 240 base.
Damn, thanks. Thought i pretty much had the codex memorised but clearly i didnt.
|
Aurora SMs in 5th Ed (18 wins, 3 draws, 13 losses)
1st in Lords of Terra Open (Sydney) 2012
Aurora SMs in 6th Ed (3 wins, 0 draws, 5 losses))
|
|
 |
 |
|