| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 04:57:22
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Point Marion, Pennsylvania
|
Hi.
I'm a newer player, just started playing WH40K when 6th edition came out, and I'm still somewhat foggy about certain rules.
I play as Necrons and I was fighting a Space Marine army earlier this week. I had a line of Necron Warriors spread out, and one end of the line got assaulted by the marines. It was at the extreme edge of his dice roll to get to my unit, so even with his 3 inch pile-in move, he wasn't able to get within fighting distance of my whole battle line. Out of the 15 models in my unit, only 5 were within 2 inches of the combat.
He went first (Due to Necrons 2 init) and inflicted a bunch of wounds, I saved all but 6. However, only 5 of my guys were within 2 inches of any of his models.Should the extra wound have been discarded? Or does that extra wound get placed on my model that is closest to the combat, even though he's not within normal assault combat?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 04:59:13
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Thee is no limit to who can be wounded in close combat.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 05:07:41
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Point Marion, Pennsylvania
|
So even if a model is 4 inches away from combat, it can still be wounded? Just to clarify.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 05:08:21
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Agreed. p25, last para, makes it clear that any model in the unit can be wounded.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 05:09:48
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Iron Dragon wrote:
So even if a model is 4 inches away from combat, it can still be wounded? Just to clarify.
Exactly the same as in shooting, when a unit 11" away with a model 36" away at their furthest can all be killed by a bolt pistol wearing unit. Page 16 and page 25 make this clear for both shooting and close combat
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 05:10:37
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Captain of the Forlorn Hope
|
Iron Dragon wrote:
So even if a model is 4 inches away from combat, it can still be wounded? Just to clarify.
If a model is in the unit that is taking the casualties, then it can be wounded even if it is 30 inches away and out of Line of Sight.
|
"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.
I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!
We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 05:11:30
Subject: Re:A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Death-Dealing Dark Angels Devastator
Point Marion, Pennsylvania
|
Alright, thanks so much for the quick replies. It turns out we did the allocation properly then. Later, he assaulted another of my units and killed so many of them that I couldn't even reach him with my 3 inch pile-in when it was my init step and the assault ended.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 07:06:36
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Abhorrent Grotesque Aberration
|
DeathReaper wrote:Iron Dragon wrote:
So even if a model is 4 inches away from combat, it can still be wounded? Just to clarify.
If a model is in the unit that is taking the casualties, then it can be wounded even if it is 30 inches away and out of Line of Sight.
Not exactly. If the only models left are those out of LOS, then the wounds are lost. You can't kill what you can't see. Pg 16: Out of Sight
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2012/10/12 07:15:44
------------------
"Why me?" Gideon begged, falling to his knees.
"Why not?" - Asdrubael Vect |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2012/10/12 09:01:58
Subject: A question about wound allocation in assault
|
 |
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw
|
clively wrote: DeathReaper wrote:Iron Dragon wrote:
So even if a model is 4 inches away from combat, it can still be wounded? Just to clarify.
If a model is in the unit that is taking the casualties, then it can be wounded even if it is 30 inches away and out of Line of Sight.
Not exactly. If the only models left are those out of LOS, then the wounds are lost. You can't kill what you can't see. Pg 16: Out of Sight
actually no, DR was referring to CC.
The rule you specified is to shooting.
So that makes you incorrect.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|