Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Automatically Appended Next Post: My friend just pointed out to me that the "X" legendary looks like it has Christmas decorations on it.
So, Xmas legendary
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/09 08:27:35
I think that the Grass/Fight, Fire/Psy, and Water/Dark is a good idea because you have the advantage of two types as well as the need for trainers to train other Pokémon
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Bulbapedia wrote:The Legendary Pokémon seen but not named in the first Pokémon X and Y trailer have now been named. The deer-like Pokémon is Xerneas and the bird-like Pokémon is Yveltal.
They've been named in the UK BEFORE Japan. Wow.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/09 17:59:52
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
Bulbapedia wrote:The Legendary Pokémon seen but not named in the first Pokémon X and Y trailer have now been named. The deer-like Pokémon is Xerneas and the bird-like Pokémon is Yveltal.
I like the look of the legendaries. Haven't owned a poke game since Emerald and the last one I played was Diamond. I had great times playing Sapphire against my friend's Ruby in Year Two. He used to play nearly every day for 2 hours + whilst I only could play once a week for an hour. He had a level 75 groudon that would stomp my Kyogre into the ground with Earthquake. Then I got my Kyogre to 50 or something and his was still in the 70s. Hydro Pump or something knocked him out. The look on his face was priceless!
Picked up a 3DS XL just for this, thought I'd get it now, as a little something from Microsoft might be requiring a lot of my monies come the latter half of the year.
Grabbed Pokemon Black as well so my eldest lad can have a go before this arrives.
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/09 20:46:26
"That's not an Ork, its a girl.." - Last words of High General Daran Ul'tharem, battle of Ursha VII.
Two White Horses (Ipswich Town and Denver Broncos Supporter)
Though I still dont get why fighting is good against dark. (Yes, applying logic to pokemon I know)
Fighting is all about honourable, 1 on 1 challenge against an opponent, Dark is all about sneaking up on somebody and being dirty as hell about it. Essentially, it means that in a legit fight with nowhere to hide or ability to cheat, Fighting pummels Dark.
We need more things good against dark
No we don't. Fighting is one of the best offensive types in the game. And besides, Dark isn't a particularly great offensive type anyway.
Bulbapedia wrote:The Legendary Pokémon seen but not named in the first Pokémon X and Y trailer have now been named. The deer-like Pokémon is Xerneas and the bird-like Pokémon is Yveltal.
They've been named in the UK BEFORE Japan. Wow.
They're not being localised this time. We're seeing the first time they've had a global release.
Also they put up the pronunciations ZURR-nee-us and ee-VELL-tall. Which as a guestimation makes them ザニオス (Zanios) and イベタル (Ibetaru).
I think I finally see a pokemon game I am staying the hell away from..... sure its cool that they upped the graphics but sadly the pokemon themselves look like utter garbage now that they have lost their sprite charm and gone to full on objects. The starters look decent though.
Well, this is obvious. But most drawing programs these days have the ability to emulate watercolour/pencil crayons/whateverthehelltheyusedtouse fairly well.
What's more, the current artstyle allows them to get away with some really artificial looking work. I'd attribute the blandness of the last 2-3 generations' designs to not just to running out of ideas, but to an artstyle that encourages flat, overly deformed designs.
Morathi's Darkest Sin wrote: Picked up a 3DS XL just for this, thought I'd get it now, as a little something from Microsoft might be requiring a lot of my monies come the latter half of the year.
Grabbed Pokemon Black as well so my eldest lad can have a go before this arrives.
Male sure you register it with Club Nintendo, as you can get a free download of one of 5 decent games.
Fafnir wrote: Honestly, as far as appearances are concerned, I'm still sore over the change from the really old watercolour look from the first generation.
I'm disappointed that Bulbasaur didn't get a Lemon Mortar attack.
Mandorallen turned back toward the insolently sneering baron. 'My Lord,' The great knight said distantly, 'I find thy face apelike and thy form misshapen. Thy beard, moreover, is an offence against decency, resembling more closely the scabrous fur which doth decorate the hinder portion of a mongrel dog than a proper adornment for a human face. Is it possibly that thy mother, seized by some wild lechery, did dally at some time past with a randy goat?' - Mimbrate Knight Protector Mandorallen.
Excerpt from "Seeress of Kell", Book Five of The Malloreon series by David Eddings.
"You need not fear us, unless you are a dark heart, a vile one who preys on the innocent; I promise, you can’t hide forever in the empty darkness, for we will hunt you down like the animals you are, and pull you into the very bowels of hell." Iron - Within Temptation
It's been seen to use a wide variety of moves, including electrical and fire moves as well as Swift and what looked like Final Gambit.
Pokémon uploaded a video to Youtube today.
Veteran Sergeant wrote:If 40K has Future Rifles, and Future Tanks, and Future Artillery, and Future Airplanes and Future Grenades and Future Bombs, then contextually Future Swords seem somewhat questionable to use, since it means crossing Future Open Space to get Future Shot At.
Polonius wrote:I categorically reject any statement that there is such a thing as too much boob.
Coolyo294 wrote:Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
