| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 16:16:49
Subject: No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
I don't know, but it seems normal that invulnerable saves shouldn't be allowed to be taken against psycic attacks. I don't know if this is a rule, but discuss?
|
World Eater's 3rd Company-1650 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 16:25:18
Subject: Re:No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
They can be taken against psychic attacks if the psychic attacks cause wounds. Why should armour/cover block psychic attacks, but not force fields?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2013/01/26 16:26:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 18:11:22
Subject: Re:No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
I meant that no saves should be able to protect you. Hiding or armor won't save you. But the psychic power should be able to penetrate through the invulnerable save, which is sort of magic, if you think about it.
|
World Eater's 3rd Company-1650 pts |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 19:45:09
Subject: Re:No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Almost no psychic powers are some kind of mental attack. Most of them make stuff and burn/bludgeon/mutilate with them. Why would a force field that can stop a defense laser not be able to stop those?
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 20:04:14
Subject: No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Focused Dark Angels Land Raider Pilot
|
Simply... No...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/26 23:40:29
Subject: Re:No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Esteemed Veteran Space Marine
|
DarknessEternal wrote:Almost no psychic powers are some kind of mental attack. Most of them make stuff and burn/bludgeon/mutilate with them. Why would a force field that can stop a defense laser not be able to stop those?
He's probably thinking of Psychic Shriek which specifically states no armour save allowed, but the invulnerable save rules override that. While I agree with the reasoning behind it, I think an overall rule change is unnecessary, just update the power listings that are specifically mental attacks to state, "No save of any kind, including invulnerable".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2013/01/27 16:46:41
Subject: No Invulnerable Save against physicic powers
|
 |
Dour Wolf Priest with Iron Wolf Amulet
|
Admittedly it would make witchfire powers actually worth using now, but it'd probably require some rebalancing.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|