Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Yeah, that would be. shocking. to say the least.

Disney has released and produced R rated films under it's Touchstone films label, as we covered the first time Disney and Star War's unholy alliance came up.

Fear the Mouse. He can multitask.

Wasn't "Kids" a quasi Disney release?

whembly wrote:

 azazel the cat wrote:

whembly wrote:

 rubiksnoob wrote:
A Tarantino movie about the Coruscanti underworld would be off the chain.

Putting blasters and light sabers in Tarantino's hand! It'd be a gorefest!

Except that blasters, being energy weapons, don't actually punch holes in people... they just kinda leave burn marks. And Lightsabers instantly cauterize wounds. So no, Kill Bill it ain't.

Oh yes, and also: Disney will never release a non-PG13 (is that still a thing in the US?) or higher movie about Star Wars. Never.

May not be bloody... but body parts would be flying!

Have you not noticed that in previous movies the only "flying body parts" are of the "Droid" variants?

There is one very shot clip of an alien's arm laying on the floor after Obi-Wan cuts it off in the Mos Eisley Cantina in A New Hope.

Hordini wrote:

 azazel the cat wrote:

Oh yes, and also: Disney will never release a non-PG13 (is that still a thing in the US?) or higher movie about Star Wars. Never.

Do you mean they will only release G or PG-rated Star Wars films? Or are you saying they might release PG-13-rated Star Wars films but nothing R-rated?

The latter. Thank you for pointing out exactly how crappy my sentence was. Damn...

 KalashnikovMarine wrote:
Disney has released and produced R rated films under it's Touchstone films label, as we covered the first time Disney and Star War's unholy alliance came up.

Fear the Mouse. He can multitask.

Yeah, but Star Wars seems like an area that an R rated movie for it would cause a lot of uproar. Kids want to watch Star Wars, so releasing something R-rated for it could stir up a flakstorm of negative publicity.

It would be like releasing an R rated The Last Airbender or Pokemon. Bad move all around.

 Manchu wrote:
Why are you guys calling Boba Fett "Bobba"?

I want Bubba Fett, replete with redneckified pickup spaceship sported massive rebel flags.

My siblings and me always called him Bubba Fat as a joke.

There was also Jabba the Toot, Fluke, and Jar Jar Stinks.

 Grey Templar wrote:
Of course, if you are a real SW buff you will know he managed to escape the Sarrlock pit. The scene of him crawling out of the pit was cut from the original and never made it onto the theactrical version.

I highly doubt that was ever filmed, let alone conceived at the time of RotJ. Pretty sure it happened in a bounty hunter novel, and was later expanded upon when Bubba Phat blew up his impersonator Jodo Kast.

There was a time when I paid attention to such just. Now it needs to die in a chemical fire.

I recall watching it in the extended edition's special features as a deleted scene. They did indeed film it.

 Grey Templar wrote:
I recall watching it in the extended edition's special features as a deleted scene. They did indeed film it.

Confirmed, vhs special edition star wars.

Necron123 wrote:Hobart fett is not that great. When he is fighting Luke, he doesent use Wang of the 50 weapons he has. Instead he uses the equivalent gun to a gaurd laz gun.

I....Uh...What?

Revan.

/throws money at screen