Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Ailaros wrote: So, you really, really need to get rid of the 2-wound restriction.
Or, better, just use the standard combat patrol rules that people with a lot more experience and understanding of the game have created.
There is no such thing as a hobby without politics. "Leave politics at the door" is itself a political statement, an endorsement of the status quo and an attempt to silence dissenting voices.
Ailaros wrote: So, you really, really need to get rid of the 2-wound restriction.
Or, better, just use the standard combat patrol rules that people with a lot more experience and understanding of the game have created.
Thanks for all the reasons against the choice, I looked at the combat rules - http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/235985.page there pretty much the same bar 400 points and less armour, so the people with more experience place the same issues being brought up here, unless theres another version?
